Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for era modifiers used to rerun anti-e MVA tauID for NanoAOD #31302

Merged

Conversation

mbluj
Copy link
Contributor

@mbluj mbluj commented Aug 31, 2020

PR description:

This PR fixes way in which era modifiers are used to switch between different versions of anti-e MVA tauID for NanoAOD. Namely, with setup updated in this PR the tau ID with the most recent (2018) training is rerun as a part of nanoAOD sequences for (explicitly listed) past nanoAOD eras, while the tauID with an old (2015) training is read from input miniAOD. For other (new) eras, conversely: the tauID with the old training is rerun, while the one with the new training is read from input miniAOD.

This PR reverts changes introduced in 064713f and follows discussion in #31065 (comment)

PR validation:

Tested with relevant nanoAOD workflows.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31302/18033

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mbluj for master.

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/NanoAOD

@gouskos, @cmsbuild, @fgolf, @mariadalfonso, @santocch, @peruzzim can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@gpetruc this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 31, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 721c785
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4b22d7/9022/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-31-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4b22d7/9022/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2609667
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2609644
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

+xpog
fix the switch of previous eras
validation is here #31065 (comment)

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

type bug-fix

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Sep 1, 2020

+1

@qliphy qliphy merged commit 6f62f0b into cms-sw:master Sep 1, 2020
@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor

mrodozov commented Sep 1, 2020

is this a fix for the two relvals that started failing few days ago :
1329.1 and 136.7722 ?

@mbluj
Copy link
Contributor Author

mbluj commented Sep 1, 2020

is this a fix for the two relvals that started failing few days ago :
1329.1 and 136.7722 ?

It was not intention of this PR. Actually, I do not know nothing about those failures; are they related to taus in nanoAOD?

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Sep 1, 2020

is this a fix for the two relvals that started failing few days ago :
1329.1 and 136.7722 ?

The fix for 1329.1 and 136.6622 is #31303

@santocch
Copy link

santocch commented Sep 2, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

@mbluj mbluj deleted the CMSSW_11_2_X_tau-pog_antiEleMVANanoFix branch October 10, 2023 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants