-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bring back GEDGsfElectronFinalizer to be a stream module, instead of a global one #28853
Bring back GEDGsfElectronFinalizer to be a stream module, instead of a global one #28853
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28853/13603
|
A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta for master. It involves the following packages: RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
As noticed in the github issue #28849, when #28746 GEDGsfElectronFinalizer was changed from a stream module to a global module that broke thread safety.
This PR brings back the GEDGsfElectronFinalizer to be a stream module, instead of a global one
PR validation:
It runs in the short matrix