PCL SiPixel Alignment: integration of quality checks on payload and DQM module

[cerminar]

This PR modifies only the PCL sequences for the alignment of the Pixel large structures.
It integrates the needed checks for the creation of the payload and the DQM module to monitor the movements of the alignables.

This is needed to start testing the new workflow in production environment.

This is equivalent to PR #13983 for 81X.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @cerminar for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/CommonAlignmentProducer
Alignment/MillePedeAlignmentAlgorithm

@cmsbuild, @mmusich, @franzoni, @cerminar, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @pakhotin, @tocheng, @tlampen, @mschrode, @mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[mmusich]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/12238/console

[mmusich]

@ghellwig for the sake of curiosity how is the millepede internal labeling going to behave with the phase-I geometry?

[ghellwig]

@mmusich I think, as long as the number of alignables does not exceed 700000 we are fine:

https://github.com/cerminar/cmssw/blob/PCLDQMPlots_80X_v2/Alignment/MillePedeAlignmentAlgorithm/src/PedeLabelerBase.cc#L22

Haven't checked it, though.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 39c8948
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13984/12238/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13984/12238/summary.html

[cerminar]

Ops, this PR was obviously meant for 80X since there is already one in 81X, sorry for the noise.