Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test AdaBoost conversion to GBRForest #10327

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 29, 2015

Conversation

lgray
Copy link
Contributor

@lgray lgray commented Jul 23, 2015

Move GsfElectronAlgo / Producers to use edm::GlobalCache object + GBRForest.

This pull request features a few AdaBoost BDTs that are converted to GBRForest, using the functionality from #10275.

No physics changes expected beyond jitter.

cms-data PR here: cms-data/RecoEgamma-ElectronIdentification#3

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @lgray (Lindsey Gray) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

Test AdaBoost conversion to GBRForest

It involves the following packages:

CondFormats/EgammaObjects
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers
RecoEgamma/ElectronIdentification
RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterTools
RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFTracking

@diguida, @cvuosalo, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @ggovi, @mmusich can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@apfeiffer1, @Sam-Harper, @mmarionncern, @bachtis this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@bendavid
Copy link
Contributor

are you sure you have GetClassifier vs GetAdaBoostClassifier in the right places?

@bendavid
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
Tested at: 39126d5
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
1306.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/1306.0_SingleMuPt1_UP15+SingleMuPt1_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15+MINIAODMCUP15/step3_SingleMuPt1_UP15+SingleMuPt1_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15+MINIAODMCUP15.log

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10327/6437/summary.html

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

Memory use measurement in progress...

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

For #10327 d6b8b0f

Converting GsfElectronAlgo / Producers to use edm::GlobalCache object + GBRForest. There should be no significant change in monitored quantities, though there may be some jitter.

The code changes are satisfactory, and Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-07-27-2300 show no significant differences, as expected.

Memory usage for workflow 25202.0_TTbar_13 with 70 events and no DQM or Validation against the same baseline shows a 70 MB reduction in RSS:

Baseline
Max VSIZ 1868.8 on evt 57 ; max RSS 1631.89 on evt 57
Time av 15.0774 s/evt max 37.3317 s on evt 57
M1 Time av 14.7675 s/evt max 37.3317 s on evt 57

PR 10327
Max VSIZ 1849.55 on evt 57 ; max RSS 1559.58 on evt 57
Time av 14.9711 s/evt max 41.7561 s on evt 1
M1 Time av 14.5829 s/evt max 36.7071 s on evt 57

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants