Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SKIMS in Conf data processing 76 #10226

Merged

Conversation

franzoni
Copy link

  • Includes a new key (PhysicsSkims) to allow inclusion of SKIM: in the prompt processing, in the same step as RECO
  • added a new test which probes such new key for "ppRun2" "ppRun2B0T" scenarios

@cerminar

@hufnagel : can you please take a look and comment ? The integration with T0 needs to follow the same logic of the ALCA, using the skim matrix with @PRIMARYDATASET syntax. The committed example in run_CfgTest.sh demostrates the principle

@sextonkennedy : we spoke about this, do you haev comments ?

@franzoni
Copy link
Author

please test

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_7_6_X milestone Jul 15, 2015
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @franzoni (Giovanni Franzoni) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

SKIMS in Conf data processing 76

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/DataProcessing

@cmsbuild, @franzoni, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@franzoni
Copy link
Author

+1
scram build runtests succeeds

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants