-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CMSSW_11_2_0 dqm:@rerecoCommon requires sim information to run #32634
Comments
A new Issue was created by @davidlange6 David Lange. @Dr15Jones, @dpiparo, @silviodonato, @smuzaffar, @makortel, @qliphy can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
assign dqm |
New categories assigned: dqm @jfernan2,@andrius-k,@fioriNTU,@kmaeshima,@ErnestaP you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
@seungjin-yang @quark2 @hyunyong as GEM DQM contacts, can you please have a look and provide a fix? |
@jshlee I found some problems. But I can’t find |
@dildick can you look into this. |
yes, I'm working on a fix |
@seungjin-yang I'm afraid there is no GEMPadDigiClusterProducer yet for real data; the development the unpacker is still ongoing. What you can do is 1) unpack the GEMDigis (add
|
So either implement it here https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/StandardSequences/python/RawToDigi_cff.py, or we can define a sequence in https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/tree/master/EventFilter/GEMRawToDigi/python. |
@dildick Thank you for your guidance. I made a simple patch. Can you review it? slowmoyang@ca70c5b |
@davidlange6 Can you tell me which matrix or file I should use for testing? |
@seungjin-yang it looks ok |
@davidlange6, @jfernan2 Can you give me workflow number or a test input file for testing patch slowmoyang@ca70c5b ? |
I believe the easiest thing is take a random run3 mc workflow and adjust the step 2 output and step3 config as suggested in the first message of this issue.
… On Feb 23, 2021, at 1:33 PM, seungjin-yang ***@***.***> wrote:
@davidlange6, @jfernan2 Can you give me workflow number or a test input file for testing patch ***@***.*** ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Thanks! |
@seungjin-yang I'll submit a (modified) PR. |
@davidlange6 This issue can be closed. |
+1 |
This issue is fully signed and ready to be closed. |
Running a reco job
cmsDriver.py step3 --conditions auto:phase1_2021_realistic -n -1 --era Run3 --eventcontent AODSIM,MINIAODSIM,DQM --runUnscheduled -s RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,RECOSIM,EI,PAT,DQM:@rerecoCommon+@miniAODDQM --datatier AODSIM,MINIAODSIM,DQMIO --geometry DB:Extended --
nThreads 8 --filein file:tt_digi_DIGI_DATAMIX_L1_DIGI2RAW_HLT.root --fileout recostep.root --suffix "-j JobReport5.xml " --customise Validation/Performance/TimeMemorySummary.customiseWithTimeMemorySummary
on a RAWSIM input yields
An exception of category 'ProductNotFound' occurred while
[0] Processing Event run: 1 lumi: 1 event: 11 stream: 0
[1] Running path 'dqmoffline_14_step'
[2] Prefetching for module L1TMuonEndCapTrackProducer/'valEmtfStage2Digis'
[3] Prefetching for module GEMPadDigiClusterProducer/'simMuonGEMPadDigiClusters'
[4] Calling method for module GEMPadDigiProducer/'simMuonGEMPadDigis'
Exception Message:
Principal::getByToken: Found zero products matching all criteria
Looking for type: MuonDigiCollection<GEMDetId,GEMDigi>
Looking for module label: simMuonGEMDigis
Looking for productInstanceName:
my understanding is that DQM should not need any sim information (let alone sim information that is not in RAWSIM data tier)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: