-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix for edm class version check #89
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch scramv3. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: Build The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: BuildI found compilation error when building: >> Checking EDM Class Transients in libPhysicsToolsFWLite.so @@@@ ----> OK EDM Class Version >> Checking EDM Class Transients in libDataFormatsHLTReco.so @@@@ ----> OK EDM Class Version >> Checking EDM Class Transients in libCalibrationHcalCalibAlgos.so error: class 'pat::Muon' has a different checksum for ClassVersion 29. Increment ClassVersion to 30 and assign it to checksum 4221614933 Suggestion: You can run 'scram build updateclassversion' to generate src/DataFormats/PatCandidates/src/classes_def_objects.xml.generated with updated ClassVersion >> Checking EDM Class Version for src/DataFormats/PatCandidates/src/classes_def_trigger.xml in libDataFormatsPatCandidates.so @@@@ ----> OK EDM Class Version >> Checking EDM Class Transients in libPhysicsToolsPatUtils.so Error in : Dictionary trigger function for DataFormatsPatCandidates_x3r not found |
bda452d
to
c7f9d83
Compare
Pull request #89 was updated. |
test parameters:
|
please test |
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next scramv3 IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a74df0/22454/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
Make sure to fail the build process if EDM Class Version or EDM Class Transients checks fail