-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backport MXNet and DeepBoostedJet models. #4326
Backport MXNet and DeepBoostedJet models. #4326
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @hqucms (Huilin Qu) for branch IB/CMSSW_10_2_X/gcc700. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @gudrutis, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
backport of #4207 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready The workflows 1001.0, 1000.0, 140.53, 136.85, 136.8311, 136.7611, 136.731, 4.22 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Comparison Summary:
|
Comparison job queued. |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
@fabiocos |
@slava77 as this PR does not concern only mxnet but also RecoBTag combined I preferred to link it to the integration of the CMSSW code, which is not part of 10_2_5 (pending its validation in 10_3_X) |
On 9/13/18 9:35 AM, Fabio Cossutti wrote:
@slava77
as this PR does not concern only mxnet but also RecoBTag combined I
preferred to link it to the integration of the CMSSW code, which is not
part of 10_2_5 (pending its validation in 10_3_X)
Thank you for the clarification.
Please note that the change in RecoBTag combined is only in the deepAK8
files [1].
The modifications are to suppress a warning message in the files which
are already in 10_2_X.
cms-data/RecoBTag-Combined@V01-00-13...V01-00-14
|
+1 |
merge |
No description provided.