Skip to content

Conversation

lindskogen
Copy link
Contributor

Continued the work of @natew

Also I moved the createContext call underneath all the import statements because my vscode was complaining about that.

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit c5c1ce6:

Sandbox Source
upbeat-chandrasekhar-p73jj Configuration

@natew
Copy link

natew commented Oct 24, 2019

Nice, thanks for taking this. I just don’t have bandwidth for it. Would love to see this library concurrent compatible, it’s the only thing holding us up at the moment!

If this isn't done in the constructor, the manager value is initially undefined on first mount when trying to call this.context.manager.add in the register() method of SortableElement
@Hypnosphi
Copy link
Contributor

Hypnosphi commented Feb 14, 2020

@clauderic Can you please return to reviewing this? React Concurrent mode is getting closer every day =)

@devmrin
Copy link

devmrin commented Mar 12, 2020

Hi, any update on this PR?

@jancama2
Copy link

jancama2 commented May 8, 2020

@clauderic Hi, how does it look like with the review? :)

@tmartensen
Copy link

Is it possible to get this merged, if this will at least temporarily fix the Warning: Legacy context API has been detected within a strict-mode tree. warning in the browser?

Hypnosphi added a commit to Hypnosphi/awesome-react-components that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2020
[`react-sortable-hoc`](https://github.com/clauderic/react-sortable-hoc) is incompatible with future React versions, and its maintainers show no reaction to PR fixing this: clauderic/react-sortable-hoc#624

[`react-measure`](https://github.com/tajo/react-movable) is an accessible, low-sized, and well-maintained alternative
@mrleemon
Copy link

Can anyone merge this, please? My console is full of "Legacy context API has been detected within a strict-mode tree" warnings.

@davvilla
Copy link

Hello, I'm getting a ton of the legacy API warnings. Are there any plans to merge this to fix them?

Thanks!

@hamzamubeen-sl2
Copy link

hamzamubeen-sl2 commented Feb 12, 2021

Hi @clauderic when will this PR be merged or will it not be merged?
we are using strict mode in our project and i am seeing a lot of console errors.

@clauderic clauderic merged commit d3dad44 into clauderic:master Mar 19, 2021
toptaldev92 pushed a commit to toptaldev92/awesome-react-components that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2021
[`react-sortable-hoc`](https://github.com/clauderic/react-sortable-hoc) is incompatible with future React versions, and its maintainers show no reaction to PR fixing this: clauderic/react-sortable-hoc#624

[`react-measure`](https://github.com/tajo/react-movable) is an accessible, low-sized, and well-maintained alternative
KeepGrowingHere pushed a commit to KeepGrowingHere/awesome-react-components that referenced this pull request May 9, 2023
[`react-sortable-hoc`](https://github.com/clauderic/react-sortable-hoc) is incompatible with future React versions, and its maintainers show no reaction to PR fixing this: clauderic/react-sortable-hoc#624

[`react-measure`](https://github.com/tajo/react-movable) is an accessible, low-sized, and well-maintained alternative
devsoft0615 added a commit to devsoft0615/React_Component that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2023
[`react-sortable-hoc`](https://github.com/clauderic/react-sortable-hoc) is incompatible with future React versions, and its maintainers show no reaction to PR fixing this: clauderic/react-sortable-hoc#624

[`react-measure`](https://github.com/tajo/react-movable) is an accessible, low-sized, and well-maintained alternative
aleksandaralek added a commit to aleksandaralek/awesome-react-components that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
[`react-sortable-hoc`](https://github.com/clauderic/react-sortable-hoc) is incompatible with future React versions, and its maintainers show no reaction to PR fixing this: clauderic/react-sortable-hoc#624

[`react-measure`](https://github.com/tajo/react-movable) is an accessible, low-sized, and well-maintained alternative
Victory0611 added a commit to Victory0611/awesome-components that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2024
[`react-sortable-hoc`](https://github.com/clauderic/react-sortable-hoc) is incompatible with future React versions, and its maintainers show no reaction to PR fixing this: clauderic/react-sortable-hoc#624

[`react-measure`](https://github.com/tajo/react-movable) is an accessible, low-sized, and well-maintained alternative
GoldenPlayBoy added a commit to GoldenPlayBoy/test that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2024
[`react-sortable-hoc`](https://github.com/clauderic/react-sortable-hoc) is incompatible with future React versions, and its maintainers show no reaction to PR fixing this: clauderic/react-sortable-hoc#624

[`react-measure`](https://github.com/tajo/react-movable) is an accessible, low-sized, and well-maintained alternative
principlesoftware-dev pushed a commit to principlesoftware-dev/react-awesome-components that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2024
[`react-sortable-hoc`](https://github.com/clauderic/react-sortable-hoc) is incompatible with future React versions, and its maintainers show no reaction to PR fixing this: clauderic/react-sortable-hoc#624

[`react-measure`](https://github.com/tajo/react-movable) is an accessible, low-sized, and well-maintained alternative
rey0601 pushed a commit to rey0601/awesome-react-components that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2025
[`react-sortable-hoc`](https://github.com/clauderic/react-sortable-hoc) is incompatible with future React versions, and its maintainers show no reaction to PR fixing this: clauderic/react-sortable-hoc#624

[`react-measure`](https://github.com/tajo/react-movable) is an accessible, low-sized, and well-maintained alternative
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants