Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CRM-19778 - Case statuses per case type & caseType config ui improvements #9705

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 24, 2017

Conversation

colemanw
Copy link
Member

@colemanw colemanw commented Jan 22, 2017

This PR adds a new tab to the CaseType Config UI, for setting allowed statuses.

It adds basic support to the existing case UI for respecting configured statuses, so that when opening a case or changing its status, the form will only show options appropriate to that case type.

It also includes a few other improvements to the CaseType Config UI, displaying icons and labels for activity types instead of machine names, and using a popup to add new activity/relationship types so that they can be fully configured.

casetypeconfig

@colemanw colemanw force-pushed the CRM-19778 branch 4 times, most recently from d66b20d to 37cc3ce Compare January 23, 2017 04:16
@coldrunKacper
Copy link
Contributor

Approved.

@colemanw
Copy link
Member Author

@civicrm-builder retest this please

@mlutfy
Copy link
Member

mlutfy commented Jan 24, 2017

jenkins, test this please

4 similar comments
@mlutfy
Copy link
Member

mlutfy commented Jan 24, 2017

jenkins, test this please

@mlutfy
Copy link
Member

mlutfy commented Jan 24, 2017

jenkins, test this please

@mlutfy
Copy link
Member

mlutfy commented Jan 24, 2017

jenkins, test this please

@mlutfy
Copy link
Member

mlutfy commented Jan 24, 2017

jenkins, test this please

@colemanw
Copy link
Member Author

Unrelated fail.

@colemanw colemanw merged commit 192c495 into civicrm:master Jan 24, 2017
@colemanw colemanw deleted the CRM-19778 branch January 24, 2017 19:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants