Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Afform - Rename blocks and joins for clarity #21218

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2021

Conversation

colemanw
Copy link
Member

Overview

Renames the ambiguously named "block" and "join" afform properties, and changes the naming convention to "af{type}-title-munged".

@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Aug 22, 2021

(Standard links)

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Aug 22, 2021
@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

Test fails look related but other than that this looks fine to me @colemanw

Renames the ambiguously named "block" and "join" afform properties,
and changes the naming convention to "af{type}-title-munged".
@colemanw
Copy link
Member Author

@seamuslee001 was that a MOP endorsement?

@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

Tested works well merging

@seamuslee001 seamuslee001 merged commit a732def into civicrm:master Aug 23, 2021
@seamuslee001 seamuslee001 deleted the afformLocationType branch August 23, 2021 23:35
colemanw added a commit to colemanw/civicrm-core that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2022
Fixes dev/core#3120
Regression caused by civicrm#21218
Also fixes undefined variable errors when editing a block.
colemanw added a commit to colemanw/civicrm-core that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
Fixes dev/core#3120
Regression caused by civicrm#21218
Also fixes undefined variable errors when editing a block.
colemanw added a commit to colemanw/civicrm-core that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
Fixes dev/core#3120
Regression caused by civicrm#21218
Also fixes undefined variable errors when editing a block.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants