Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev/financial#118 Move source & receive date to the top on contribution view page #16565

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2020

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton commented Feb 17, 2020

Overview

Slight re-ordering of fields on contribution view - moves source & date to near the top

Before

b4

After

Screen Shot 2020-02-17 at 7 27 28 PM

Technical Details

Per https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/financial/issues/118 this doesn't seem to be controversial - although there is a desire
to take it further & once this is merged I'll look at that - ie the moving the fees block up

fees

Comments

Double 'total amount' on before is unrelated

…on view page

Per https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/financial/issues/118 this doesn't seem to be controversial - although there is a desire
to take it further & once this is merged I'll look at that
@civibot civibot bot added the master label Feb 17, 2020
@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Feb 17, 2020

(Standard links)

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

test this please

@yashodha
Copy link
Contributor

@eileenmcnaughton looks good, can be merged. Are we waiting for further consensus?

@mattwire
Copy link
Contributor

Merging per @yashodha review

@mattwire mattwire merged commit cfe5347 into civicrm:master Feb 17, 2020
@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton deleted the contview branch February 17, 2020 20:54
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yashodha I guess not :-) But the issue had 5+ & 0 against & with you that is 6-nil so it seems to be getting a clear response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants