Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Translate description in DAO files #13005

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2018

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Translate description in DAO files

Before

Description field not translated in DAO descriptions - this would only really be apparent when calling the getfields api.

After

Description field translated in DAO descriptions

Technical Details

This relates to the attempt here #12971
to use description directly in the Entity Forms & questions as to whether it is translated.

Currently they are not but there seems like no downside in translating them

Comments

@mattwire @seamuslee001 @colemanw @mlutfy @totten can anyone think of any downsides of doing this.

(note this will go stale quickly)

This relates to the attempt here civicrm#12971
to use description directly in the Entity Forms & questions as to whether it is translated.

Currently they are not but there seems like no downside in translating them
@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Oct 24, 2018

(Standard links)

@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

I don't have a concern with this

@colemanw
Copy link
Member

My only concern is that it adds addnl burden for translators to translate a bunch of (currently) unused strings.

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@colemanw I guess the mitigating factor there is it allows us to sync up the schema & form descriptions & start to only maintain the schema one

@colemanw colemanw merged commit cd82575 into civicrm:master Oct 25, 2018
@colemanw
Copy link
Member

Caved into the peer/time pressure :)

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton deleted the dao_desc_ts branch October 25, 2018 21:29
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

lol - I'll merge #12971 then

@JoeMurray
Copy link
Contributor

I like this idea and am happy to see this merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants