Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added missing field name in custom-field deletion dialog #12869

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2018

Conversation

dereklewis123
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

The dialog that pops up when a custom field is deleted, does not show the name of the field to be deleted.

Before

The name of the field in the deletion dialog box was missing.
missing custom-field name in deletion dialog

After

The name of the field in the deletion dialog box is now visible.
present custom-field name in deletion dialog

@civicrm-builder
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@mattwire
Copy link
Contributor

I've tested this, it's a minor UI bug and assigning an extra variable to the template fixes it. Merge on pass @seamuslee001

@colemanw
Copy link
Member

@civicrm-builder add to whitelist

@JKingsnorth
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins retest this please

@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

Removed the Merge on pass as per @JKingsnorth

@JKingsnorth
Copy link
Contributor

I agree with @mattwire that this does fix the issue and is good to merge when the tests are fixed (the failures seem unrelated).

@totten totten added the master label Oct 2, 2018
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

test this please

@totten
Copy link
Member

totten commented Oct 7, 2018

jenkins, test this please

@totten
Copy link
Member

totten commented Oct 7, 2018

Congratulations on the first PR! Thanks for the well-formed description.

Also, thanks to the sprinters at Bamford for the group review. The well-formed description on this PR made it really helpful as a group-training discussion.

(CiviCRM Review Template DEL-1.1)

  • Explain (r-explain)
    • PASS : The goal/problem/solution have been adequately explained in the PR.
  • Test results (r-test)
    • PASS: The test results have failures, but these have been individually inspected and found to be irrelevant.
  • Code quality (r-code)
    • PASS: The functionality, purpose, and style of the code seems clear+sensible.
  • Documentation (r-doc)
    • PASS: The changes do not require documentation.
  • Maintainability (r-maint)
    • PASS: The change sufficiently improves test coverage, or the change is trivial enough that it does not require tests.
  • Run it (r-run)
    • PASS: Attempted to delete a stock custom-field ("Camera Skill Level") from a demo site. The patch fixes the display as expected.
  • User impact (r-user)
    • PASS: The change would be intuitive or unnoticeable for a majority of users who work with this feature.
  • Technical impact (r-tech)
    • PASS: The change preserves compatibility with existing callers/code/downstream.

@totten totten merged commit 8a4ce1a into civicrm:master Oct 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants