You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The provided simulation Verilog model of CC_PLL isn't a correct representation of the true CC_PLL's behavior. Whatever parameters put in when instantiating CC_PLL get lost and the output clock frequency is just half the input.
This can be especially confusing when running simulation of the examples built in with the tools.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @pu-cc , given recent finding related to Issue#17: ... there is indeed a misconfiguration of a CPE that leads to incorrect inversion..., could that also be the root cause of this PLL simulation problem?
No, the CPE configuration and the simulation models are completely unrelated to each other.
The PLL model is used exclusively for the simulation and has so far been kept so simple on purpose; of course with the disadvantage that no real frequencies are generated. We have now revised the model for the upcoming update. I will let you know here so that we can close #14. Incidentally, this is not a bug, but a functional enhancement.
The provided simulation Verilog model of CC_PLL isn't a correct representation of the true CC_PLL's behavior. Whatever parameters put in when instantiating CC_PLL get lost and the output clock frequency is just half the input.
This can be especially confusing when running simulation of the examples built in with the tools.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: