Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TODO] πŸ‘· Kill Travis CI in favor of GHA #343

Closed
1 of 3 tasks
webknjaz opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed
1 of 3 tasks

[TODO] πŸ‘· Kill Travis CI in favor of GHA #343

webknjaz opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Improvement

Comments

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

webknjaz commented Dec 1, 2020

❓ I'm submitting a ...

  • 🐞 bug report
  • 🐣 feature request
  • ❓ question about the decisions made in the repository

🐞 Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

We've burnt through the trial credits and now the builds are disabled (https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing / https://blog.travis-ci.com/oss-announcement)

🐣 Describe the solution you'd like

Fully migrate to GHA

πŸ“‹ Describe alternatives you've considered

Beg for free OSS credits (time-consuming and not guarantees).

πŸ“‹ Additional context

https://webknjaz.me/prose/et-tu-brute-use-travis-ci-for-foss-no-more/

@jaraco
Copy link
Member

jaraco commented Dec 3, 2020

I've dropped support for Travis in jaraco/skeleton. I have no objections.

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member Author

webknjaz commented Dec 3, 2020

I've committed some changes to master already but PyPy support needs to be polished a bit, I have some experiments in a separate branch.

webknjaz added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2020
webknjaz added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants