Tweaking production/development language to distroless/dev #2025
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Mark Drake <mark@chainguard.dev>
✅ Deploy Preview for ornate-narwhal-088216 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[ ] Check if this is a typo or other quick fix and ignore the rest :)
Type of change
The main focus of this PR is to update the "Differences Between Development and Production Images" so it no longer uses this distinction.
Instead, I landed on "Distroless vs
-devimages". I think this may be an imperfect solution but we haven't gotten a clear answer on the preferred language and I think this is generic enough that it won't raise too many eyebrows. I also updated a number of other docs that mention production/development images in this context. I think I captured every case where this happens.What should this PR do?
resolves https://github.com/chainguard-dev/internal/issues/4564
Why are we making this change?
Reducing confusion, as we already use the term "Production Image" to refer to our paid tier throughout Academy.
What are the acceptance criteria?
Changes should make sense.
How should this PR be tested?
Close review of the changes, please! I did my best to reword things as necessary but some language could be clunky.
Note that if we're squeamish about this naming convention, it wasn't that big of a lift to update these docs and we could easily update them again down the line if needed.
Preview link: https://deploy-preview-2025--ornate-narwhal-088216.netlify.app/chainguard/chainguard-images/about/differences-distroless-dev/