-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
__repr__ and __str__ suggestion #208
Labels
Comments
cdgriffith
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 11, 2021
…Robbins) * Fixing internal `_safe_key` logic to be twice as fast
Adding these features in 6.0, currently have a release candidate that can be installed and tested with:
6.0 is ushering in Cython speedups on supported platforms, so please let me know if you run into any issues! |
Merged
cdgriffith
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2022
* Adding Cython support to greatly speed up normal Box operations on supported systems * Adding #161 support for access box dots with `get` and checking with `in` (thanks to scott-createplay) * Adding #183 support for all allowed character sets (thanks to Giulio Malventi) * Adding #196 support for sliceable boxes (thanks to Dias) * Adding #164 default_box_create_on_get toggle to disable setting box variable on get request (thanks to ipcoder) * Changing #208 __repr__ to produce `eval`-able text (thanks to Jeff Robbins) * Changing #215 support ruamel.yaml new syntax (thanks to Ivan Pepelnjak) * Changing `update` and `merge_update` to not use a keyword that could cause issues in rare circumstances * Changing internal `_safe_key` logic to be twice as fast * Removing support for ruamel.yaml < 0.17
Box 6 has been released with this added, thanks for opening the issue! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The current
__repr__
function, while perfectly valid per the Python docs, could be made more informative by indicating that nesteddict
s are actually alsoBox
objects. With a couple of small changes, as sketched below, that missing info could be made available, along with making the__repr__
outputeval
able, which is also valid per the Python docs.Correct code, instead of my quick and dirty monkey patch, should use
self._box_config["box_class"]
instead of hardcodingBox
in the__repr__
function like I did.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: