🔧 Configure CodeRabbitAI for reviews #320
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive configuration for the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant CR as CodeRabbit
participant Repo as Repository
Dev->>Repo: Creates/Updates Pull Request
Repo->>CR: Triggers Review Process
CR->>CR: Apply Configuration Settings
CR->>Repo: Analyze Code
CR->>Dev: Provide Review Feedback
Dev->>Repo: Respond to Feedback
The sequence diagram illustrates the review process triggered by the new Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.coderabbit.yaml (4)
3-5: Consider enhancing tone instructions for sensitive scenarios.While the current instructions promote a friendly tone, consider adding guidance for handling security issues or critical bugs.
tone_instructions: >- Maintain a friendly tone, focusing on identifying issues and suggesting - elegant, pragmatic solutions. + elegant, pragmatic solutions. When addressing security concerns or critical + issues, maintain professionalism while emphasizing the urgency and importance + of the matter.
6-12: Consider collapsing detailed walkthroughs for cleaner reviews.The current setting
collapse_walkthrough: falsewill show all detailed explanations expanded by default, which might make reviews appear verbose. Consider setting it totruefor a cleaner initial view while keeping the details accessible when needed.review_status: true - collapse_walkthrough: false + collapse_walkthrough: true
13-21: Enhance Elm-specific review guidelines.While the current instructions cover important aspects, consider adding Elm-specific guidelines about:
- The Elm Architecture (TEA) patterns
- Type system best practices
- Common pitfalls in Elm development
Review the Elm code with attention to: - Principles of clean code (readability, simplicity, minimalism). - Expressiveness and idiomatic use of Elm. - Performance considerations in functional programming. - Suggest best practices and improvements where applicable. + Suggest best practices and improvements where applicable, particularly: + - Proper usage of The Elm Architecture (TEA) + - Effective use of Elm's type system and custom types + - Common pitfalls like recursive type definitions + - Module organization and component boundaries
26-27: Consider adding more chat configuration options.While auto-reply is enabled, you might want to configure additional chat settings such as:
- Response time limits
- Custom greeting messages
- Specific topics or areas where chat assistance is most valuable
chat: auto_reply: true + response_timeout: 300 # 5 minutes + greeting: "Hello! I'm here to help with your Elm code review questions." + focus_areas: + - "elm architecture" + - "type system" + - "performance optimization"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.coderabbit.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
1-2: LGTM! Basic configuration looks good.
The language setting and early access flag are properly configured.
22-25: LGTM! Auto-review configuration is well-considered.
The settings are appropriate for on-demand reviews, with clear documentation via comments.
Self explanatory.
Summary by CodeRabbit