-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add known-to-fail counterexamples to Bech32 string corruption tests. #328
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5beb548
Increase maximum number of runs for Bech32 adjacent character swap test.
jonathanknowles 536ed98
Allow a known-to-fail counterexample within the Bech32 character omis…
jonathanknowles 3a49b99
Allow a known-to-fail counterexample within the Bech32 character inse…
jonathanknowles File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the rationale here 🤔 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question. I'm currently updating the issue with a longer explanation. Will let you know when I've finished writing. :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In our current test case, we assume that deleting a character from a valid Bech32 string will create an invalid Bech32 string.
I think this is a fair assumption, as Bech32 was designed with the specific goal of collision resistance. When entering one Bech32 string, it's supposed to be very hard to collide with another Bech32 string just by making a small typo.
Experimental testing shows that there is at least one known counterexample to this law: when a Bech32 string ends in
qp
, it's possible to delete a singleq
character and still produce a valid Bech32 string. This works for any number ofq
characters.The fact that it's possible to produce a collision just by deleting a single character comes as a surprise.
The above change adjusts the test case to account for this counterexample.