Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove dqlite-next build configuration #704

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cole-miller
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Cole Miller cole.miller@canonical.com

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.66%. Comparing base (d79661f) to head (474ed25).
Report is 45 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #704      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.74%   85.66%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         197      197              
  Lines       29040    29034       -6     
  Branches     4084     4065      -19     
==========================================
- Hits        24901    24872      -29     
+ Misses       3915     3873      -42     
- Partials      224      289      +65     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

res += 8; /* Local data length, applies to all entries */
#endif
}
(void)with_local_data;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a TODO or something in each of these methods saying that this argument is not used and should be removed, same with the local data struct declaration.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am okay removing them later, but we need to keep track of it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, good catch.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I went ahead and removed the remaining traces of the local_data work.

Signed-off-by: Cole Miller <cole.miller@canonical.com>
I've preserved is_local since it's still potentially useful.

Signed-off-by: Cole Miller <cole.miller@canonical.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants