docs(play): include billing information in play docs

[huygur]

Description

closes https://github.com/camunda/play/issues/622

When should this change go live?

• This is a bug fix, security concern, or something that needs urgent release support.
• This is already available but undocumented and should be released within a week.
• This on a specific schedule and the assignee will coordinate a release with the DevEx team. (apply hold label or convert to draft PR)
• This is part of a scheduled alpha or minor. (apply alpha or minor label)
• There is no urgency with this change and can be released at any time.

PR Checklist

• My changes are for an already released minor and are in /versioned_docs directory.
• My changes are for the next minor and are in /docs directory (aka /next/).

• My changes require an Engineering review, and I've assigned the Engineering DRI or delegate.
• My changes require a technical writer review, and I've assigned @camunda/tech-writers as a reviewer.

[github-actions]

👋 🤖 🤔 Hello! Did you make your changes in all the right places?

These files were changed only in docs/. You might want to duplicate these changes in versioned_docs/version-8.5/.

• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/play-your-process.md

You may have done this intentionally, but we wanted to point it out in case you didn't. You can read more about the versioning within our docs in our documentation guidelines.

[huygur]

Is there a link we can use here to contact CSM? 🤔

[ultraschuppi]

i don't think this is documented anywhere in the outside world

[huygur]

do you mean we should leave this without a link, or change the wording here

[ultraschuppi]

i think leaving it like this is fine - if "CSM" is a term known to customers

[ultraschuppi]

our users do not need to know that there is something like an internal plan.

also not sure if trial plan is actually what should be taken? isn't it rather called "Camunda SaaS Trial" by now? probably best for @felix-mueller to comment on

[huygur]

removed the 'Internal Plan', waiting for @felix-mueller suggestion for the Trial 👀

[ultraschuppi]

i don't think this is documented anywhere in the outside world

[HanselIdes]

This links to localhost- probably not where we want to send customers

[huygur]

😮 fixed it

[HanselIdes]

Enterprise customers can also use Development clusters.

This should be the first option.

I am trying to consolidate multiple instances of Web Modeler wherever possible. This is critical for upcoming changes for tracking the development lifecycle across multiple stages and consolidating development and optimization efforts.

In 8.7, when deployment permissions are pushed to the clusters rather than Console, we can start making this shift.

[huygur]

I included this part and added a link to where this is mentioned. please check the plan descriptions again.

I kept the part where enterprise organizations can be marked as 'dev organization' to avoid costs as @ultraschuppi mentioned this was also a way to avoid the costs.

[HanselIdes]

LGTM

[conceptualshark]

🚀

[huygur]

@conceptualshark the only open question that is blocking this PR to be merge is this : #4299 (comment) , which was awaiting input from @felix-mueller , but maybe you or @HanselIdes also have information regarding this?

another alternative would be to keep it as it is and release a patch later if @felix-mueller would like it to be changed, as this PR is currently blocking Play to move forward with another feature that requires links to this doc 😅

[conceptualshark]

@huygur Unfortunately I don't have any more information on trial plan naming - we use Trial/Free Trial throughout the docs, so if there is a decision to start specifying SaaS (or using another name), we can always make a ticket for that and update it across the docs.

[huygur]

@conceptualshark ok then, thanks. I will merge this PR then to unblock Play.