Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the print for the Docker compose environment #3788

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2018
Merged

Conversation

sbrunner
Copy link
Member

@sbrunner sbrunner commented Jun 5, 2018

No description provided.

@sbrunner sbrunner added this to the 2.3 milestone Jun 5, 2018
@sbrunner sbrunner requested a review from pvalsecc June 5, 2018 08:15
@sbrunner sbrunner force-pushed the print-docker branch 8 times, most recently from 83b16c9 to 865620d Compare June 6, 2018 07:33
do
export VISIBLE_WEB_HOST_RE_ESCAPED=`python -c "print(__import__('re').escape('${VISIBLE_WEB_HOST}'))"`
export VISIBLE_ENTRY_POINT_RE_ESCAPED=`python -c "print(__import__('re').escape('${VISIBLE_ENTRY_POINT}'))"`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Detail, but this could be done once, before the loop.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For me it introduce too may complexity just for 2 variables ...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Misunderstood, done :-)

@sbrunner sbrunner force-pushed the print-docker branch 2 times, most recently from 6f7ac42 to e191698 Compare June 6, 2018 11:54
@sbrunner sbrunner merged commit 752b8fa into 2.3 Jun 6, 2018
@sbrunner sbrunner deleted the print-docker branch June 6, 2018 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants