-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 329
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FIX RefererResult bug #975
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fa7065c
fixed referer retrieval bug (if the context path string was present in
valeriolopes f41182d
fixed referer retrieval bug - if the context path string was present in
valeriolopes 93b9a96
Revert "fixed referer retrieval bug - if the context path string was …
valeriolopes 3f05d6f
Revert "fixed referer retrieval bug (if the context path string was p…
valeriolopes 602c752
Fix referer retrieval bug
valeriolopes cecb90e
Enhancement on referer retrieval
valeriolopes 322f0a5
Merge pull request #1 from valeriolopes/defaultrefererfix
valeriolopes File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Too much context to execute a simple check. Maybe it's better to relax visibility of getReferer() to protected and test only this method, what do you think?
and we get an extra extension point.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, that was my first commit on VRaptor so I tried to write comprehensive unit tests :-) - but I agree it's too much for something so simple. In addition it's a hard condition to achieve, the strings must match in a little-prob coincidence.
About the extension point, I don't have an opinion - would you expect this class to be extended? If so, then yes it's a good way to maintain its structure (or else people would have to create another method to perform this check, or even put its code within the callers)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your tests are fine =)
it's just that this test class has several tests that could be testing only getReferer(), not the whole redirect or forward methods.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, I followed the other methods pattern but we could have simple tests which would check if the returned string matches the expected value and we're good to go. Wanna me to change that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, please @valeriolopes! After that change we can merge this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I ended up creating another pull request (976); I really need to stop and play with git (we still use svn here). The changes are there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, thanks @valeriolopes. So I think we close this PR, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, looks like the other one embraces everything
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeap! thks