Skip to content

Conversation

ansidev
Copy link
Contributor

@ansidev ansidev commented Sep 21, 2025

What changed?

  • Renamed common/blobstore/interface.go to common/blobstore/client.go
  • Regenerate common/blobstore/interface_mock.go to common/blobstore/client_mock.go.
  • Fixed fail tests.

Why?
Fixes https://github.com/cadence-workflow/cadence/issues/6759.

How did you test it?
make test

Potential risks
N/A

Release notes
N/A

Documentation Changes
N/A


func TestRetryableClient_IsRetryableError(t *testing.T) {
mockClient := new(MockClient)
func (s *RetryableClientTestSuite) TestIsRetryableError() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

directionally, I think we'd like to move away from using the suite pattern towards plain table-tests and plain go, but in mixed files like this, it's certainly fine to move towards consistency.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@davidporter-id-au moved away from using the suite pattern

@davidporter-id-au davidporter-id-au enabled auto-merge (squash) September 21, 2025 20:55
auto-merge was automatically disabled September 21, 2025 23:27

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@ansidev ansidev force-pushed the cadence-6759-common-blobstore branch 2 times, most recently from c6a9faf to a867f49 Compare September 22, 2025 13:13
Signed-off-by: Le Minh Tri <ansidev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Le Minh Tri <ansidev@gmail.com>
@ansidev ansidev force-pushed the cadence-6759-common-blobstore branch from a867f49 to 5621486 Compare September 23, 2025 14:14
@davidporter-id-au davidporter-id-au enabled auto-merge (squash) September 23, 2025 17:40
@davidporter-id-au davidporter-id-au merged commit 72d3984 into cadence-workflow:master Sep 23, 2025
39 of 42 checks passed
@ansidev ansidev deleted the cadence-6759-common-blobstore branch September 24, 2025 02:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants