-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add apiKey as a mutable property of BugsnagEvent #458
Merged
robinmacharg
merged 2 commits into
spec-compliance
from
robinmacharg/Add-apiKey-as-a-mutable-property
Feb 10, 2020
Merged
Add apiKey as a mutable property of BugsnagEvent #458
robinmacharg
merged 2 commits into
spec-compliance
from
robinmacharg/Add-apiKey-as-a-mutable-property
Feb 10, 2020
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
robinmacharg
force-pushed
the
robinmacharg/Add-apiKey-as-a-mutable-property
branch
from
February 6, 2020 15:30
f56a790
to
dcec383
Compare
robinmacharg
force-pushed
the
robinmacharg/Add-apiKey-as-a-mutable-property
branch
2 times, most recently
from
February 7, 2020 10:10
f2e03c5
to
8436791
Compare
robinmacharg
changed the title
Robinmacharg/add api key as a mutable property
Add apiKey as a mutable property of BugsnagEvent
Feb 7, 2020
fractalwrench
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left a couple of minor comments but otherwise this change LGTM. Happy for it to be merged once the tests are passing and comments resolved 👍
robinmacharg
force-pushed
the
robinmacharg/Add-apiKey-as-a-mutable-property
branch
from
February 10, 2020 11:44
8436791
to
0400c6e
Compare
robinmacharg
deleted the
robinmacharg/Add-apiKey-as-a-mutable-property
branch
February 10, 2020 13:39
robinmacharg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2020
* refactor: rename BugsnagCrashReport to BugsnagEvent * feat: add per-BugsnagEvent mutable apiKey
robinmacharg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2020
* refactor: rename BugsnagCrashReport to BugsnagEvent * feat: add per-BugsnagEvent mutable apiKey
robinmacharg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2020
* refactor: rename BugsnagCrashReport to BugsnagEvent * feat: add per-BugsnagEvent mutable apiKey
robinmacharg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2020
* refactor: rename BugsnagCrashReport to BugsnagEvent * feat: add per-BugsnagEvent mutable apiKey
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Goal
Add an
apiKey
property toBugsnagEvent
(neeBugsnagCrashReport
). The behaviour is:BugsnagConfiguration.apiKey
.Design
A simple
@property
with custom getter/setter logic and validation. TheBugsnagConfiguration.isValidApiKey
method was promoted to class-level since it's now used in two places.Failing validation logs the failure but doesn't throw an error. The thinking is that there will always be a fallback valid (32 digit hex string) apiKey and so event capture is the priority.
Changeset
Just
BugsnagEvent.m/h
and associated unit tests.Tests
Tested that:
Did not add any testing that the overridden
apiKey
value is correctly being sent to the backend via HTTP headers although this was observed in informal testing. A solution to this involving swizzling theApiClient
class was examined but deemed unnecessarily complex.Review
Outstanding Questions
master
for fixes,next
forfeatures)