Add trap()->code() sugar

[lee-to]

What was changed

Nothing changes, just sugar

Before

trap()->context(language: 'php')

After

trap()->code('php')

Why?

The presence of a method will give you an immediate understanding of the presence of this feature even without referring to the documentation, it will be easier to remember, and it will be immediately clear what’s what

Checklist

• Tested
  • Tested manually
  • Unit tests added
• Documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 24.25%. Comparing base (78873fb) to head (4852dfd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #103      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     24.21%   24.25%   +0.04%     
- Complexity     1122     1123       +1     
============================================
  Files           129      129              
  Lines          3403     3405       +2     
============================================
+ Hits            824      826       +2     
  Misses         2579     2579              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[roxblnfk]

Need to think about the meaning.
Does ->highlight('php') look clear?
Or something like ->language('php'), ->syntax('php') are more clear.

Also tests and a function description are required.

[lee-to]

Need to think about the meaning. Does ->highlight('php') look clear? Or something like ->language('php'), ->syntax('php') are more clear.

Also tests and a function description are required.

I think highlight because even in the documentation the section is called highlight and we are talking about output

If we speak syntax or language, it is not immediately clear what exactly this affects

[roxblnfk]

Thanks
I think the bug with named arguments in Buggregator Server shouldn't block us.