Skip to content

Conversation

grafikrobot
Copy link
Member

@grafikrobot grafikrobot commented Jul 20, 2024

This is part of the effort to make the Boost libraries "modular" for build and consumption. See https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2024/01/255704.php and https://github.com/grafikrobot/boost-b2-modular/blob/b2-modular/README.adoc for more information.

This PR depends on the following other PRs being merged to both develop and master branches of the respective repos:

This PR will be changed to ready for review, i.e. not draft, when the above are merged. Do not merge this one until that time.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.37%. Comparing base (48ff7b9) to head (44589d8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop      #88   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.37%   99.37%           
========================================
  Files          168      168           
  Lines         6702     6702           
========================================
  Hits          6660     6660           
  Misses          42       42           

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 48ff7b9...44589d8. Read the comment docs.

@grafikrobot grafikrobot marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2024 15:19
@grafikrobot
Copy link
Member Author

Please review and merge this PR at your earliest convenience.

Copy link
Member

@mborland mborland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this now boost_odeint instead of boost_numeric_odeint? In build.jam that alias seems to point to the former.

@grafikrobot
Copy link
Member Author

Is this now boost_odeint instead of boost_numeric_odeint? In build.jam that alias seems to point to the former.

Yes. I normalized all the B2 global project names to /boost/<repo-name>. As it allows for consistent search of the projects once this is used in package managers (or manually) that will key on the repo name instead of the location in the super-project.

@mborland mborland merged commit 00381ec into boostorg:develop Aug 19, 2024
35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants