Regalloc all instructions #2

boomanaiden154 · 2022-06-21T23:40:51Z

This PR modifies the previously implemented extractInstructionFeatures function to extract all instructions for each live range (up to 100 instructions currently). The instructions will get passed to the model through a combination of a sequential array of instructions (The instructions tensor) and a matrix mapping the live range indices to the instructions (the instruction_lr_map tensor). The approach I'm using to generate these tensors involves collecting all the individual segments of the interfering tensors (grabbed from the already existing extractFeatures function and stored in StartEndSlotIndices), and then processing them after all of the other features have been extracted. The algorithm for generating the array/mapping matrix does the following:

sorts the incoming slot index pairs into increasing order by the beginning slot index
iterates through each segment pair, setting instructions and mappings as necessary.

One other design decision that needs to be considered is the total number of instructions passed to the model. Currently passing 100, but in my pretty preliminary testing, quite a few of the examples under analysis ended up needing more than 100 instructions. Passing around 200 seems to capture the entirety of most examples. Once there is a concrete plan on the ML side, (and have a somewhat intuitive understanding of how this value will impact inference/training time), a decision can probably be made on a value.

In preparation to work on a register eviction model that takes advantage of instruction based features, this commit adds a very basic instruction feature, just taking all of the def/use instructions for the live range under analysis and putting them into a tensor of length 10, cropping and padding as needed due to limitations in libtensorflow.

boomanaiden154 · 2022-06-21T23:45:36Z

@mtrofin, Here are the code changes that I mentioned today. The approach is a little bit different than the current feature extraction (extracting preliminary data for instruction extraction during normal feature extraction and then processing everything), but due to the sequential necessity of the instruction array and the mapping matrix, it would be difficult to tie everything in tightly with the current feature extraction code.

boomanaiden154 · 2022-06-23T22:16:49Z

Updated the model to only create a single tensor(instructions_and_mapping) so that when performing preprocessing on the ml-compiler-opt side, the necessary steps can be performed on the data being passed to the model.

boomanaiden154 · 2022-06-24T02:30:20Z

Changed the number of instructions to 300 as that seems to encompass most of the instructions for each eviction problem (but definitely not all, seems like the value would have to be set to 1000 for that). The operation taking in this matrix and passing it to the ML model isn't too expensive (matrix multiplication of binary matrix and instruction embeddings), but it is still matrix multiplication, so the computational complexity is not particularly great. Also fixed a bug where I was just using the current segment being processed as the tensor index rather than the position of that segment. Debug output (for which the generating code has been removed from the commit) have been attached to this comment.
output3.txt

mtrofin · 2022-06-24T16:21:08Z

llvm/lib/CodeGen/MLRegallocEvictAdvisor.cpp

+      // set instruction
+      auto *CurrentMachineInstruction =
+          LIS->getInstructionFromIndex(CurrentIndex);
+      if (CurrentMachineInstruction == nullptr) {


in LLVM style, you can just if (!CurrentMachineInstruction)

also, right away, skip debug instructions and intrinsics.

llvm/lib/CodeGen/MLRegallocEvictAdvisor.cpp

mtrofin · 2022-06-24T16:28:59Z

llvm/lib/CodeGen/MLRegallocEvictAdvisor.cpp

+
+    for (auto CurrentSegment : LI) {
+      StartEndSlotIndices.push_back(
+          std::make_tuple(CurrentSegment.start, CurrentSegment.end, Pos));


It may be more readable if the tuple were replaced by a struct with explicitly named fields. Then the StartEndSlotIndices could be modeled as a vector of const such values - because they only need to be emplaced, never mutated, iiuc.

llvm/lib/CodeGen/MLRegallocEvictAdvisor.cpp

mtrofin · 2022-06-24T16:51:01Z

llvm/lib/CodeGen/MLRegallocEvictAdvisor.cpp

@@ -192,6 +210,8 @@ static const std::vector<int64_t> PerLiveRangeShape{1, NumberOfInterferences};
    "largest stage of an interval in this LR")                                 \
  M(int64_t, min_stage, PerLiveRangeShape,                                     \
    "lowest stage of an interval in this LR")                                  \
+  M(int64_t, instructions_and_mapping, InstructionsAndMappingShape,            \


may be helpful to show in a comment how this is laid out. IIUC, each line corresponds to an instruction. The first column is the instruction opcode, the rest correspond to each candidate LR. We tick (set to 1) each [line][ LR_corresponding_column] where that LR spans over that instruction.

2 questions:

(open question) would it be ML-preferable to place the opcodes instead of '1' tickmarks? i.e. repeat the opcode where it is used, and drop the leftmost column?

in the algo, it may be easier to not worry about overlaps. Instead, for each LR, set the opcode (idempotent if already set) and tick its position in the LR. (unless I'm missing smth)

I'll talk with Yundi about that one. Thinking about it now, just passing the opcodes should be more efficient on the ML side because it avoids a matrix multiplication (at least I would think more efficient).

We'd need frequency data too, but that would be pretty easy to pass along to the model as well structuring the extraction like that. It wouldn't even necessarily make things a lot more difficult to implement on the ML side as it could still be implemented as a matrix multiply and the position data that the current approach uses is not used at all. I'll let Yundi get back to me, but that is probably a better approach since the position data is currently irrelevant.

ack, not sure Yundi saw this, pasting it in slack

This diff adjusts AddedComplexity of BIC to bump its position in the list of patterns to make LLVM pick it instead of MVN + AND. MVN + AND requires 2 cycles, so does e.g. MOV + BIC, but the latter outperforms the former if the instructions producing the operands of BIC can be issued in parallel. One may consider the following example: ldur x15, [x0, #2] # 4 cycles mvn x10, x15 # 1 cycle (depends on ldur) and x9, x10, #0x8080808080808080 vs. ldur x15, [x0, #2] # 4 cycles mov x9, #0x8080808080808080 # 1 cycle (can be executed in parallel with ldur) bic x9, x9, x15. # 1 cycle Test plan: ninja check-all Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133345

This change prevents rare deadlocks observed for specific macOS/iOS GUI applications which issue many `dlopen()` calls from multiple different threads at startup and where TSan finds and reports a race during startup. Providing a reliable test for this has been deemed infeasible. Although I've only observed this deadlock on Apple platforms, conceptually the cause is not confined to Apple code so the fix lives in platform-independent code. Deadlock scenario: ``` Thread 2 | Thread 4 ReportRace() | Lock internal TSan mutexes | &ctx->slot_mtx | | dlopen() interceptor | OnLibraryLoaded() | MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules() | calls dyld API, which takes internal lock | lock() interceptor | TSan tries to take internal mutexes again | &ctx->slot_mtx call into symbolizer | MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules() calls dyld API, which hangs on trying to take lock ``` Resulting in: * Thread 2 has internal TSan mutex, blocked on dyld lock * Thread 4 has dyld lock, blocked on internal TSan mutex The fix prevents this situation by not intercepting any of the calls originating from `MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules()`. Stack traces for deadlock between ReportRace() and dlopen() interceptor: ``` thread #2, queue = 'com.apple.root.default-qos' frame #0: libsystem_kernel.dylib frame #1: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_os_unfair_lock_lock_with_options(lock=<unavailable>, options=<unavailable>) at tsan_interceptors_mac.cpp:306:3 frame #2: dyld`dyld4::RuntimeLocks::withLoadersReadLock(this=0x000000016f21b1e0, work=0x00000001814523c0) block_pointer) at DyldRuntimeState.cpp:227:28 frame #3: dyld`dyld4::APIs::_dyld_get_image_header(this=0x0000000101012a20, imageIndex=614) at DyldAPIs.cpp:240:11 frame #4: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::CurrentImageHeader(this=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:391:35 frame #5: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(this=0x000000016f2a2800, segment=0x000000016f2a2738) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:397:51 frame #6: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules(this=0x000000016f2a2800, modules=0x00000001011000a0) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:460:10 frame #7: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::ListOfModules::init(this=0x00000001011000a0) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:610:18 frame #8: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::FindModuleForAddress(unsigned long) [inlined] __sanitizer::Symbolizer::RefreshModules(this=0x0000000101100078) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:185:12 frame #9: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::FindModuleForAddress(this=0x0000000101100078, address=6465454512) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:204:5 frame #10: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::SymbolizePC(this=0x0000000101100078, addr=6465454512) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:88:15 frame #11: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::SymbolizeCode(addr=6465454512) at tsan_symbolize.cpp:106:35 frame #12: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::SymbolizeStack(trace=StackTrace @ 0x0000600002d66d00) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:112:28 frame #13: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedReportBase::AddMemoryAccess(this=0x000000016f2a2a90, addr=4381057136, external_tag=<unavailable>, s=<unavailable>, tid=<unavailable>, stack=<unavailable>, mset=0x00000001012fc310) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:190:16 frame #14: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ReportRace(thr=0x00000001012fc000, shadow_mem=0x000008020a4340e0, cur=<unavailable>, old=<unavailable>, typ0=1) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:795:9 frame #15: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::DoReportRace(thr=0x00000001012fc000, shadow_mem=0x000008020a4340e0, cur=Shadow @ x22, old=Shadow @ 0x0000600002d6b4f0, typ=1) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:166:3 frame #16: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(void *) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:220:5 frame #17: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(void *) [inlined] __tsan::MemoryAccess(thr=0x00000001012fc000, pc=<unavailable>, addr=<unavailable>, size=8, typ=1) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:442:3 frame #18: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(addr=<unavailable>) at tsan_interface.inc:34:3 <call into TSan from from instrumented code> thread #4, queue = 'com.apple.dock.fullscreen' frame #0: libsystem_kernel.dylib frame #1: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::FutexWait(p=<unavailable>, cmp=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:540:3 frame #2: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Semaphore::Wait(this=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mutex.cpp:35:7 frame #3: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Mutex::Lock(this=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:196:18 frame #4: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=<unavailable>, mu=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:383:10 frame #5: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=<unavailable>, mu=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:382:77 frame #6: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() at tsan_rtl.h:708:10 frame #7: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __tsan::TryTraceFunc(thr=0x000000010f084000, pc=0) at tsan_rtl.h:751:7 frame #8: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __tsan::FuncExit(thr=0x000000010f084000) at tsan_rtl.h:798:7 frame #9: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor(this=0x000000016f3ba280) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:300:5 frame #10: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor(this=<unavailable>) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:293:41 frame #11: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_os_unfair_lock_lock_with_options(lock=0x000000016f21b1e8, options=OS_UNFAIR_LOCK_NONE) at tsan_interceptors_mac.cpp:310:1 frame #12: dyld`dyld4::RuntimeLocks::withLoadersReadLock(this=0x000000016f21b1e0, work=0x00000001814525d4) block_pointer) at DyldRuntimeState.cpp:227:28 frame #13: dyld`dyld4::APIs::_dyld_get_image_vmaddr_slide(this=0x0000000101012a20, imageIndex=412) at DyldAPIs.cpp:273:11 frame #14: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(__sanitizer::MemoryMappedSegment*) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:286:17 frame #15: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(this=0x000000016f3ba560, segment=0x000000016f3ba498) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:432:15 frame #16: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules(this=0x000000016f3ba560, modules=0x000000016f3ba618) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:460:10 frame #17: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::ListOfModules::init(this=0x000000016f3ba618) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:610:18 frame #18: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::LibIgnore::OnLibraryLoaded(this=0x0000000101f3aa40, name="<some library>") at sanitizer_libignore.cpp:54:11 frame #19: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_dlopen(filename="<some library>", flag=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:6466:3 <library code> ``` rdar://106766395 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146593

…callback The `TypeSystemMap::m_mutex` guards against concurrent modifications of members of `TypeSystemMap`. In particular, `m_map`. `TypeSystemMap::ForEach` iterates through the entire `m_map` calling a user-specified callback for each entry. This is all done while `m_mutex` is locked. However, there's nothing that guarantees that the callback itself won't call back into `TypeSystemMap` APIs on the same thread. This lead to double-locking `m_mutex`, which is undefined behaviour. We've seen this cause a deadlock in the swift plugin with following backtrace: ``` int main() { std::unique_ptr<int> up = std::make_unique<int>(5); volatile int val = *up; return val; } clang++ -std=c++2a -g -O1 main.cpp ./bin/lldb -o “br se -p return” -o run -o “v *up” -o “expr *up” -b ``` ``` frame #4: std::lock_guard<std::mutex>::lock_guard frame #5: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage <<<< Lock #2 frame #6: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage frame #7: lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystemForLanguage ... frame #26: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadLibraryUsingPaths frame #27: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule frame #30: swift::ModuleDecl::collectLinkLibraries frame #31: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule frame #34: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::GetCompileUnitImportsImpl frame #35: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::PerformCompileUnitImports frame #36: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetSwiftASTContext frame #37: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetPersistentExpressionState frame #38: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol frame #41: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::ForEach <<<< Lock #1 frame #42: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol frame llvm#43: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindInUserDefinedSymbols frame #44: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindSymbol frame #45: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::GetSymbolAddressAndPresence frame #46: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol frame #47: non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol frame #48: llvm::LinkingSymbolResolver::findSymbol frame llvm#49: llvm::LegacyJITSymbolResolver::lookup frame llvm#50: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols frame llvm#51: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveRelocations frame llvm#52: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeLoadedModules frame llvm#53: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeObject frame llvm#54: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::ReportAllocations frame llvm#55: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::GetRunnableInfo frame llvm#56: lldb_private::ClangExpressionParser::PrepareForExecution frame llvm#57: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::TryParse frame llvm#58: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::Parse ``` Our solution is to simply iterate over a local copy of `m_map`. **Testing** * Confirmed on manual reproducer (would reproduce 100% of the time before the patch) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149949

…est unittest Need to finalize the DIBuilder to avoid leak sanitizer errors like this: Direct leak of 48 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x55c99ea1761d in operator new(unsigned long) #1 0x55c9a518ae49 in operator new #2 0x55c9a518ae49 in llvm::MDTuple::getImpl(...) #3 0x55c9a4f1b1ec in getTemporary #4 0x55c9a4f1b1ec in llvm::DIBuilder::createFunction(...)

@foo

The motivation for this change is a workload generated by the XLA compiler targeting nvidia GPUs. This kernel has a few hundred i8 loads and stores. Merging is critical for performance. The current LSV doesn't merge these well because it only considers instructions within a block of 64 loads+stores. This limit is necessary to contain the O(n^2) behavior of the pass. I'm hesitant to increase the limit, because this pass is already one of the slowest parts of compiling an XLA program. So we rewrite basically the whole thing to use a new algorithm. Before, we compared every load/store to every other to see if they're consecutive. The insight (from tra@) is that this is redundant. If we know the offset from PtrA to PtrB, then we don't need to compare PtrC to both of them in order to tell whether C may be adjacent to A or B. So that's what we do. When scanning a basic block, we maintain a list of chains, where we know the offset from every element in the chain to the first element in the chain. Each instruction gets compared only to the leaders of all the chains. In the worst case, this is still O(n^2), because all chains might be of length 1. To prevent compile time blowup, we only consider the 64 most recently used chains. Thus we do no more comparisons than before, but we have the potential to make much longer chains. This rewrite affects many tests. The changes to tests fall into two categories. 1. The old code had what appears to be a bug when deciding whether a misaligned vectorized load is fast. Suppose TTI reports that load <i32 x 4> align 4 has relative speed 1, and suppose that load i32 align 4 has relative speed 32. The intent of the code seems to be that we prefer the scalar load, because it's faster. But the old code would choose the vectorized load. accessIsMisaligned would set RelativeSpeed to 0 for the scalar load (and not even call into TTI to get the relative speed), because the scalar load is aligned. After this patch, we will prefer the scalar load if it's faster. 2. This patch changes the logic for how we vectorize. Usually this results in vectorizing more. Explanation of changes to tests: - AMDGPU/adjust-alloca-alignment.ll: #1 - AMDGPU/flat_atomic.ll: #2, we vectorize more. - AMDGPU/int_sideeffect.ll: #2, there are two possible locations for the call to @foo, and the pass is brittle to this. Before, we'd vectorize in case 1 and not case 2. Now we vectorize in case 2 and not case 1. So we just move the call. - AMDGPU/adjust-alloca-alignment.ll: #2, we vectorize more - AMDGPU/insertion-point.ll: #2 we vectorize more - AMDGPU/merge-stores-private.ll: #1 (undoes changes from git rev 86f9117, which appear to have hit the bug from #1) - AMDGPU/multiple_tails.ll: #1 - AMDGPU/vect-ptr-ptr-size-mismatch.ll: Fix alignment (I think related to #1 above). - AMDGPU CodeGen: I have difficulty commenting on these changes, but many of them look like #2, we vectorize more. - NVPTX/4x2xhalf.ll: Fix alignment (I think related to #1 above). - NVPTX/vectorize_i8.ll: We don't generate <3 x i8> vectors on NVPTX because they're not legal (and eventually get split) - X86/correct-order.ll: #2, we vectorize more, probably because of changes to the chain-splitting logic. - X86/subchain-interleaved.ll: #2, we vectorize more - X86/vector-scalar.ll: #2, we can now vectorize scalar float + <1 x float> - X86/vectorize-i8-nested-add-inseltpoison.ll: Deleted the nuw test because it was nonsensical. It was doing `add nuw %v0, -1`, but this is equivalent to `add nuw %v0, 0xffff'ffff`, which is equivalent to asserting that %v0 == 0. - X86/vectorize-i8-nested-add.ll: Same as nested-add-inseltpoison.ll Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149893

Running this on Amazon Ubuntu the final backtrace is: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace * thread #1, name = 'a.out', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07d0 a.out`func_c at main.c:10:3 frame #1: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07c4 a.out`func_b at main.c:14:3 frame #2: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07b4 a.out`func_a at main.c:18:3 frame #3: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07a4 a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:22:3 frame #4: 0x0000fffff7b373fc libc.so.6`___lldb_unnamed_symbol2962 + 108 frame #5: 0x0000fffff7b374cc libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 152 frame #6: 0x0000aaaaaaaa06b0 a.out`_start + 48 ``` This causes the test to fail because of the extra ___lldb_unnamed_symbol2962 frame (an inlined function?). To fix this, strictly check all the frames in main.c then for the rest just check we find __libc_start_main and _start in that order regardless of other frames in between. Reviewed By: omjavaid Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154204

…tput The crash happens in clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName when Output is InputInfo::Nothing. It doesn't happen with standalone clang driver because output is created in Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache. Example backtrace: ``` * thread #1, name = 'clangd', stop reason = hit program assert * frame #0: 0x00007ffff5c4eacf libc.so.6`raise + 271 frame #1: 0x00007ffff5c21ea5 libc.so.6`abort + 295 frame #2: 0x00007ffff5c21d79 libc.so.6`__assert_fail_base.cold.0 + 15 frame #3: 0x00007ffff5c47426 libc.so.6`__assert_fail + 70 frame #4: 0x000055555dc0923c clangd`clang::driver::InputInfo::getFilename(this=0x00007fffffff9398) const at InputInfo.h:84:5 frame #5: 0x000055555dcd0d8d clangd`clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName(JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, Input=0x00007fffffff9678, Output=0x00007fffffff9398) at CommonArgs.cpp:1275:40 frame #6: 0x000055555dc955a5 clangd`clang::driver::tools::Clang::ConstructJob(this=0x000055555f6c69d0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Output=0x00007fffffff9398, Inputs=0x00007fffffff9668, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000) const at Clang.cpp:5690:33 frame #7: 0x000055555dbf6b54 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5618:10 frame #8: 0x000055555dbf4ef0 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForAction(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5306:26 frame #9: 0x000055555dbeb590 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobs(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0) const at Driver.cpp:4844:5 frame #10: 0x000055555dbe6b0f clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildCompilation(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffb268) at Driver.cpp:1496:3 frame #11: 0x000055555b0cc0d9 clangd`clang::createInvocation(ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffbb38, Opts=CreateInvocationOptions @ 0x00007fffffffbb90) at CreateInvocationFromCommandLine.cpp:53:52 frame #12: 0x000055555b378e7b clangd`clang::clangd::buildCompilerInvocation(Inputs=0x00007fffffffca58, D=0x00007fffffffc158, CC1Args=size=0) at Compiler.cpp:116:44 frame #13: 0x000055555895a6c8 clangd`clang::clangd::(anonymous namespace)::Checker::buildInvocation(this=0x00007fffffffc760, TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Contents= Has Value=false ) at Check.cpp:212:9 frame #14: 0x0000555558959cec clangd`clang::clangd::check(File=(Data = "build/test.cpp", Length = 64), TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Opts=0x00007fffffffe600) at Check.cpp:486:34 frame #15: 0x000055555892164a clangd`main(argc=4, argv=0x00007fffffffecd8) at ClangdMain.cpp:993:12 frame #16: 0x00007ffff5c3ad85 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 229 frame #17: 0x00005555585bbe9e clangd`_start + 46 ``` Test Plan: ninja ClangDriverTests && tools/clang/unittests/Driver/ClangDriverTests Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154602

ParmVarDecl of BlockDecl is unnecessarily dumped twice. Remove this duplication as other FunctionDecls. Fixes llvm#64005 (#2) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155985

TSan reports the following data race: Write of size 4 at 0x000109e0b160 by thread T2 (mutexes: write M0, write M1): #0 NativeFile::Close() File.cpp:329 #1 ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:232 #2 Communication::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) Communication.cpp:61 #3 process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::DidExit() ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:1164 #4 Process::SetExitStatus(int, char const*) Process.cpp:1097 #5 process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::MonitorDebugserverProcess(...) ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:3387 Previous read of size 4 at 0x000109e0b160 by main thread (mutexes: write M2): #0 NativeFile::IsValid() const File.h:393 #1 ConnectionFileDescriptor::IsConnected() const ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:121 #2 Communication::IsConnected() const Communication.cpp:79 #3 process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(...) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:256 #4 process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(...l) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:244 #5 process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteClientBase::SendPacketAndWaitForResponseNoLock(llvm::StringRef, StringExtractorGDBRemote&) GDBRemoteClientBase.cpp:246 The problem is that in WaitForPacketNoLock's run loop, it checks that the connection is still connected. This races with the ConnectionFileDescriptor disconnecting. Most (but not all) access to the IOObject in ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix is already gated by the mutex. This patch just protects IsConnected in the same way. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157347

TSan reports the following race: Write of size 8 at 0x000107707ee8 by main thread: #0 lldb_private::ThreadedCommunication::StartReadThread(...) ThreadedCommunication.cpp:175 #1 lldb_private::Process::SetSTDIOFileDescriptor(...) Process.cpp:4533 #2 lldb_private::Platform::DebugProcess(...) Platform.cpp:1121 #3 lldb_private::PlatformDarwin::DebugProcess(...) PlatformDarwin.cpp:711 #4 lldb_private::Target::Launch(...) Target.cpp:3235 #5 CommandObjectProcessLaunch::DoExecute(...) CommandObjectProcess.cpp:256 #6 lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(...) CommandObject.cpp:751 #7 lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(...) CommandInterpreter.cpp:2054 Previous read of size 8 at 0x000107707ee8 by thread T5: #0 lldb_private::HostThread::IsJoinable(...) const HostThread.cpp:30 #1 lldb_private::ThreadedCommunication::StopReadThread(...) ThreadedCommunication.cpp:192 #2 lldb_private::Process::ShouldBroadcastEvent(...) Process.cpp:3420 #3 lldb_private::Process::HandlePrivateEvent(...) Process.cpp:3728 #4 lldb_private::Process::RunPrivateStateThread(...) Process.cpp:3914 #5 std::__1::__function::__func<lldb_private::Process::StartPrivateStateThread(...) function.h:356 #6 lldb_private::HostNativeThreadBase::ThreadCreateTrampoline(...) HostNativeThreadBase.cpp:62 #7 lldb_private::HostThreadMacOSX::ThreadCreateTrampoline(...) HostThreadMacOSX.mm:18 The problem is the lack of synchronization between starting and stopping the read thread. This patch fixes that by protecting those operations with a mutex. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157361

TSan reports the following data race: Write of size 4 at 0x000109e0b160 by thread T2 (...): #0 lldb_private::NativeFile::Close() File.cpp:329 #1 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(...) ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:232 #2 lldb_private::Communication::Disconnect(...) Communication.cpp:61 #3 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::DidExit() ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:1164 #4 lldb_private::Process::SetExitStatus(...) Process.cpp:1097 #5 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::MonitorDebugserverProcess(...) ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:3387 Previous read of size 4 at 0x000109e0b160 by main thread (...): #0 lldb_private::NativeFile::IsValid() const File.h:393 #1 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::IsConnected() const ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:121 #2 lldb_private::Communication::IsConnected() const Communication.cpp:79 #3 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(...) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:256 #4 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(...) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:244 #5 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteClientBase::SendPacketAndWaitForResponseNoLock(...) GDBRemoteClientBase.cpp:246 I originally tried fixing the problem at the ConnectionFileDescriptor level, but that operates on an IOObject which can have different thread safety guarantees depending on its implementation. For this particular issue, the problem is specific to NativeFile. NativeFile can hold a file descriptor and/or a file stream. Throughout its implementation, it checks if the descriptor or stream is valid and do some operation on it if it is. While that works in a single threaded environment, nothing prevents another thread from modifying the descriptor or stream between the IsValid check and when it's actually being used. This patch prevents such issues by returning a ValueGuard RAII object. As long as the object is in scope, the value is guaranteed by a lock. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157347

Thread sanitizer reports the following data race: ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=43201) Write of size 4 at 0x00010520c474 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M0, write M1): #0 lldb_private::PipePosix::CloseWriteFileDescriptor() PipePosix.cpp:242 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x414700) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00) #1 lldb_private::PipePosix::Close() PipePosix.cpp:217 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4144e8) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00) #2 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:239 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x40a620) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00) #3 lldb_private::Communication::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) Communication.cpp:61 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x2a9318) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00) #4 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::DidExit() ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:1167 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x8ed984) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00) Previous read of size 4 at 0x00010520c474 by main thread (mutexes: write M2, write M3): #0 lldb_private::PipePosix::CanWrite() const PipePosix.cpp:229 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4145e4) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00) #1 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:212 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x40a4a8) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00) #2 lldb_private::Communication::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) Communication.cpp:61 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x2a9318) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00) #3 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(StringExtractorGDBRemote&, lldb_private::Timeout<std::__1::ratio<1l, 1000000l>>, bool) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:373 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x8b9c48) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00) #4 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(StringExtractorGDBRemote&, lldb_private::Timeout<std::__1::ratio<1l, 1000000l>>, bool) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:243 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x8b9904) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00) ``` Fix this by adding a mutex to PipePosix. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157654

…fine.parallel verifier This patch updates AffineParallelOp::verify() to check each result type matches its corresponding reduction op (i.e, the result type must be a `FloatType` if the reduction attribute is `addf`) affine.parallel will crash on --lower-affine if the corresponding result type cannot match the reduction attribute. ``` %128 = affine.parallel (%arg2, %arg3) = (0, 0) to (8, 7) reduce ("maxf") -> (memref<8x7xf32>) { %alloc_33 = memref.alloc() : memref<8x7xf32> affine.yield %alloc_33 : memref<8x7xf32> } ``` This will crash and report a type conversion issue when we run `mlir-opt --lower-affine` ``` Assertion failed: (isa<To>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"), function cast, file Casting.h, line 572. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: mlir-opt --lower-affine temp.mlir #0 0x0000000102a18f18 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f8f18) #1 0x0000000102a171b4 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f71b4) #2 0x0000000102a195c4 SignalHandler(int) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f95c4) #3 0x00000001be7894c4 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+0x1803414c4) #4 0x00000001be771ee0 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib+0x180329ee0) #5 0x00000001be6ac340 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x180264340) #6 0x00000001be6ab754 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x180263754) #7 0x0000000106864790 mlir::arith::getIdentityValueAttr(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (.cold.4) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x104144790) #8 0x0000000102ba66ac mlir::arith::getIdentityValueAttr(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1004866ac) #9 0x0000000102ba6910 mlir::arith::getIdentityValue(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x100486910) ... ``` Fixes llvm#64068 Reviewed By: mehdi_amini Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157985

…tePluginObject After llvm#68052 this function changed from returning a nullptr with `return {};` to returning Expected and hitting `llvm_unreachable` before it could do so. I gather that we're never supposed to call this function, but on Windows we actually do call this function because `interpreter->CreateScriptedProcessInterface()` returns `ScriptedProcessInterface` not `ScriptedProcessPythonInterface`. Likely because `target_sp->GetDebugger().GetScriptInterpreter()` also does not return a Python related class. The previously XFAILed test crashed with: ``` # .---command stderr------------ # | PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. # | Stack dump: # | 0. Program arguments: c:\\users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\build-llvm\\bin\\lldb-test.exe ir-memory-map C:\\Users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\build-llvm\\tools\\lldb\\test\\Shell\\Expr\\Output\\TestIRMemoryMapWindows.test.tmp C:\\Users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\llvm-project\\lldb\\test\\Shell\\Expr/Inputs/ir-memory-map-basic # | 1. HandleCommand(command = "run") # | Exception Code: 0xC000001D # | #0 0x00007ff696b5f588 lldb_private::ScriptedProcessInterface::CreatePluginObject(class llvm::StringRef, class lldb_private::ExecutionContext &, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::StructuredData::Dictionary>, class lldb_private::StructuredData::Generic *) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\include\lldb\Interpreter\Interfaces\ScriptedProcessInterface.h:28:0 # | #1 0x00007ff696b1d808 llvm::Expected<std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::StructuredData::Generic> >::operator bool C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\llvm\include\llvm\Support\Error.h:567:0 # | #2 0x00007ff696b1d808 lldb_private::ScriptedProcess::ScriptedProcess(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::ScriptedMetadata const &, class lldb_private::Status &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Process\scripted\ScriptedProcess.cpp:115:0 # | #3 0x00007ff696b1d124 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ScriptedProcess>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1478:0 # | #4 0x00007ff696b1d124 lldb_private::ScriptedProcess::CreateInstance(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Process\scripted\ScriptedProcess.cpp:61:0 # | #5 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0 # | #6 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0 # | #7 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0 # | #8 0x00007ff69699c8f4 lldb_private::Process::FindPlugin(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class llvm::StringRef, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Process.cpp:396:0 # | #9 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0 # | #10 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0 # | #11 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0 # | #12 0x00007ff6969bd708 lldb_private::Target::CreateProcess(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class llvm::StringRef, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Target.cpp:215:0 # | #13 0x00007ff696b13af0 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Ptr_base C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1230:0 # | #14 0x00007ff696b13af0 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1524:0 # | #15 0x00007ff696b13af0 lldb_private::PlatformWindows::DebugProcess(class lldb_private::ProcessLaunchInfo &, class lldb_private::Debugger &, class lldb_private::Target &, class lldb_private::Status &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Platform\Windows\PlatformWindows.cpp:495:0 # | #16 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0 # | #17 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0 # | #18 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0 # | #19 0x00007ff6969cf590 lldb_private::Target::Launch(class lldb_private::ProcessLaunchInfo &, class lldb_private::Stream *) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Target.cpp:3274:0 # | #20 0x00007ff696fff82c CommandObjectProcessLaunch::DoExecute(class lldb_private::Args &, class lldb_private::CommandReturnObject &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Commands\CommandObjectProcess.cpp:258:0 # | #21 0x00007ff696fab6c0 lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(char const *, class lldb_private::CommandReturnObject &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Interpreter\CommandObject.cpp:751:0 # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: 0xc000001d ``` That might be a bug on the Windows side, or an artifact of how our build is setup, but whatever it is, having `CreatePluginObject` return an error and the caller check it, fixes the failing test. The built lldb can run the script command to use Python, but I'm not sure if that means anything.

…e defintion if available (llvm#71004)" This reverts commit ef3feba. This caused an LLDB test failure on Linux for `lang/cpp/symbols/TestSymbols.test_dwo`: ``` make: Leaving directory '/home/worker/2.0.1/lldb-x86_64-debian/build/lldb-test-build.noindex/lang/cpp/symbols/TestSymbols.test_dwo' runCmd: expression -- D::i PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. HandleCommand(command = "expression -- D::i") 1. <user expression 0>:1:4: current parser token 'i' 2. <lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: parsing function body '$__lldb_expr' 3. <lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: in compound statement ('{}') Stack dump without symbol names (ensure you have llvm-symbolizer in your PATH or set the environment var `LLVM_SYMBOLIZER_PATH` to point to it): 0 _lldb.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0x00007fbcfcb08b87 1 _lldb.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0x00007fbcfcb067ae 2 _lldb.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0x00007fbcfcb0923f 3 libpthread.so.0 0x00007fbd07ab7140 ``` And a failure in `TestCallStdStringFunction.py` on Linux aarch64: ``` -- Exit Code: -11 Command Output (stdout): -- lldb version 18.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git revision ef3feba) clang revision ef3feba llvm revision ef3feba -- Command Output (stderr): -- PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. HandleCommand(command = "expression str") 1. <lldb wrapper prefix>:45:34: current parser token ';' 2. <lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: parsing function body '$__lldb_expr' 3. <lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: in compound statement ('{}') #0 0x0000ffffb72a149c llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x58c749c) #1 0x0000ffffb729f458 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x58c5458) #2 0x0000ffffb72a1bd0 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x58c7bd0) #3 0x0000ffffbdd9e7dc (linux-vdso.so.1+0x7dc) #4 0x0000ffffb71799d8 lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::SymbolFileDWARF::FindGlobalVariables(lldb_private::ConstString, lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext const&, unsigned int, lldb_private::VariableList&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x579f9d8) #5 0x0000ffffb7197508 DWARFASTParserClang::FindConstantOnVariableDefinition(lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFDIE) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x57bd508) ```

The const.cpp testcase fails when running in MSVC mode, while it does succeed in MinGW mode. In MSVC mode, there are more constructor invocations than expected, as the printout looks like this: A(1), this = 0000025597930000 A(1), this = 0000025597930000 f: this = 0000025597930000, val = 1 A(1), this = 0000025597930000 f: this = 0000025597930000, val = 1 ~A, this = 0000025597930000, val = 1 ~A, this = 0000025597930000, val = 1 ~A, this = 0000025597930000, val = 1 While the expected printout looks like this: A(1), this = 000002C903E10000 f: this = 000002C903E10000, val = 1 f: this = 000002C903E10000, val = 1 ~A, this = 000002C903E10000, val = 1 Reapplying llvm#70991 with the XFAIL changed to check the host triple, not the target triple. On an MSVC based build of Clang, but with the default target triple set to PS4/PS5, we will still see the failure. And a Linux based build of Clang that targets PS4/PS5 won't see the issue.

…ooking options for a custom subcommand (llvm#71975) …ooking options for a custom subcommand. (llvm#71776)" This reverts commit b88308b. The build-bot is unhappy (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/13096), `GroupingAndPrefix` fails after `TopLevelOptInSubcommand` (the newly added test). Revert while I look into this (might be related with test sharding but not sure) ``` [----------] 3 tests from CommandLineTest [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.TokenizeWindowsCommandLine2 [ OK ] CommandLineTest.TokenizeWindowsCommandLine2 (0 ms) [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.TopLevelOptInSubcommand [ OK ] CommandLineTest.TopLevelOptInSubcommand (0 ms) [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.GroupingAndPrefix #0 0x00ba8118 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x594118) #1 0x00ba5914 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x591914) #2 0x00ba89c4 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5949c4) #3 0xf7828530 __default_sa_restorer /build/glibc-9MGTF6/glibc-2.31/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/sigrestorer.S:67:0 #4 0x00af91f0 (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineParser::ResetAllOptionOccurrences() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x4e51f0) #5 0x00af8e1c llvm::cl::ResetCommandLineParser() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x4e4e1c) #6 0x0077cda0 (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineTest_GroupingAndPrefix_Test::TestBody() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x168da0) #7 0x00bc5adc testing::Test::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b1adc) #8 0x00bc6cc0 testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b2cc0) #9 0x00bc7880 testing::TestSuite::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b3880) #10 0x00bd7974 testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5c3974) #11 0x00bd6ebc testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5c2ebc) #12 0x00bb1058 main (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x59d058) #13 0xf78185a4 __libc_start_main /build/glibc-9MGTF6/glibc-2.31/csu/libc-start.c:342:3 ```

… functions (llvm#72069) Fixes a bug introduced by commit f95b2f1 ("Reland [InstrProf][compiler-rt] Enable MC/DC Support in LLVM Source-based Code Coverage (1/3)") The InstrProfiling pass was refactored when introducing support for MC/DC such that the creation of the data variable was abstracted and called only once per function from ::run(). Because ::run() only iterated over functions there were not fully inlined, and because it only created the data variable for the first intrinsic that it saw, data variables corresponding to functions fully inlined into other instrumented callers would end up without a data variable, resulting in loss of coverage information. This patch does the following: 1.) Move the call of createDataVariable() to getOrCreateRegionCounters() so that the creation of the data variable will happen indirectly either from ::new() or during profile intrinsic lowering when it is needed. This effectively restores the behavior prior to the refactor and ensures that all data variables are created when needed (and not duplicated). 2.) Process all MC/DC bitmap parameter intrinsics in ::run() prior to calling getOrCreateRegionCounters(). This ensures bitmap regions are created for each function including functions that are fully inlined. It also ensures that the bitmap region is created for each function prior to the creation of the data variable because it is referenced by the data variable. Again, duplication is prevented if the same parameter intrinsic is inlined into multiple functions. 3.) No longer pass the MC/DC intrinsic to createDataVariable(). This decouples the creation of the data variable from a specific MC/DC intrinsic. Instead, with #2 above, store the number of bitmap bytes required in the PerFunctionProfileData in the ProfileDataMap along with the function's CounterRegion and BitmapRegion variables. This ties the bitmap information directly to the function to which it belongs, and the data variable created for that function can reference that.

…lvm#73463) Despite CWG2497 not being resolved, it is reasonable to expect the following code to compile (and which is supported by other compilers) ```cpp template<typename T> constexpr T f(); constexpr int g() { return f<int>(); } // #1 template<typename T> constexpr T f() { return 123; } int k[g()]; // #2 ``` To that end, we eagerly instantiate all referenced specializations of constexpr functions when they are defined. We maintain a map of (pattern, [instantiations]) independent of `PendingInstantiations` to avoid having to iterate that list after each function definition. We should apply the same logic to constexpr variables, but I wanted to keep the PR small. Fixes llvm#73232

… on (llvm#74207) lld string tail merging interacts badly with ASAN on Windows, as is reported in llvm#62078. A similar error was found when building LLVM with `-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address`: ```console [2/2] Building GenVT.inc... FAILED: include/llvm/CodeGen/GenVT.inc C:/Dev/llvm-project/Build_asan/include/llvm/CodeGen/GenVT.inc cmd.exe /C "cd /D C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan && C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe -gen-vt -I C:/Dev/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen -IC:/Dev/llvm-project/Build_asan/include -IC:/Dev/llvm-project/llvm/include C:/Dev/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/ValueTypes.td --write-if-changed -o include/llvm/CodeGen/GenVT.inc -d include/llvm/CodeGen/GenVT.inc.d" ================================================================= ==31944==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ff6cff80d20 at pc 0x7ff6cfcc7378 bp 0x00e8bcb8e990 sp 0x00e8bcb8e9d8 READ of size 1 at 0x7ff6cff80d20 thread T0 #0 0x7ff6cfcc7377 in strlen (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1400a7377) #1 0x7ff6cfde50c2 in operator delete(void *, unsigned __int64) (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1401c50c2) #2 0x7ff6cfdd75ef in operator delete(void *, unsigned __int64) (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1401b75ef) #3 0x7ff6cfde59f9 in operator delete(void *, unsigned __int64) (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1401c59f9) #4 0x7ff6cff03f6c in operator delete(void *, unsigned __int64) (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1402e3f6c) #5 0x7ff6cfefbcbc in operator delete(void *, unsigned __int64) (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1402dbcbc) #6 0x7ffb7f247343 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.DLL+0x180017343) #7 0x7ffb800826b0 (C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x1800526b0) 0x7ff6cff80d20 is located 31 bytes after global variable '"#error \"ArgKind is not defined\"\n"...' defined in 'C:\Dev\llvm-project\llvm\utils\TableGen\IntrinsicEmitter.cpp' (0x7ff6cff80ce0) of size 33 '"#error \"ArgKind is not defined\"\n"...' is ascii string '#error "ArgKind is not defined" ' 0x7ff6cff80d20 is located 0 bytes inside of global variable '""' defined in 'C:\Dev\llvm-project\llvm\utils\TableGen\IntrinsicEmitter.cpp' (0x7ff6cff80d20) of size 1 '""' is ascii string '' SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1400a7377) in strlen Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x7ff6cff80a80: 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 01 f9 f9 f9 0x7ff6cff80b00: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 f9 f9 f9 0x7ff6cff80b80: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x7ff6cff80c00: 00 00 00 00 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80c80: 00 00 00 00 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 =>0x7ff6cff80d00: 01 f9 f9 f9[f9]f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80e00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80e80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb ==31944==ABORTING ``` This is reproducible with the 17.0.3 release: ```console $ clang-cl --version clang version 17.0.3 Target: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc Thread model: posix InstalledDir: C:\Program Files\LLVM\bin $ cmake -S llvm -B Build -G Ninja -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang-cl -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang-cl -DCMAKE_MSVC_RUNTIME_LIBRARY=MultiThreaded -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release $ cd Build $ ninja all ```

Internal builds of the unittests with msan flagged mempcpy_test. ==6862==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x55e34d7d734a in length llvm-project/libc/src/__support/CPP/string_view.h:41:11 #1 0x55e34d7d734a in string_view llvm-project/libc/src/__support/CPP/string_view.h:71:24 #2 0x55e34d7d734a in __llvm_libc_9999_0_0_git::testing::Test::testStrEq(char const*, char const*, char const*, char const*, __llvm_libc_9999_0_0_git::testing::internal::Location) llvm-project/libc/test/UnitTest/LibcTest.cpp:284:13 #3 0x55e34d7d4e09 in LlvmLibcMempcpyTest_Simple::Run() llvm-project/libc/test/src/string/mempcpy_test.cpp:20:3 #4 0x55e34d7d6dff in __llvm_libc_9999_0_0_git::testing::Test::runTests(char const*) llvm-project/libc/test/UnitTest/LibcTest.cpp:133:8 #5 0x55e34d7d86e0 in main llvm-project/libc/test/UnitTest/LibcTestMain.cpp:21:10 SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value llvm-project/libc/src/__support/CPP/string_view.h:41:11 in length What's going on here is that mempcpy_test.cpp's Simple test is using ASSERT_STREQ with a partially initialized char array. ASSERT_STREQ calls Test::testStrEq which constructs a cpp:string_view. That constructor calls the private method cpp::string_view::length. When built with msan, the loop is transformed into multi-byte access, which then fails upon access. I took a look at libc++'s __constexpr_strlen which just calls __builtin_strlen(). Replacing the implementation of cpp::string_view::length with a call to __builtin_strlen() may still result in out of bounds access when the test is built with msan. It's not safe to use ASSERT_STREQ with a partially initialized array. Initialize the whole array so that the test passes.

We'd like a way to select the current thread by its thread ID (rather than its internal LLDB thread index). This PR adds a `-t` option (`--thread_id` long option) that tells the `thread select` command to interpret the `<thread-index>` argument as a thread ID. Here's an example of it working: ``` michristensen@devbig356 llvm/llvm-project (thread-select-tid) » ../Debug/bin/lldb ~/scratch/cpp/threading/a.out (lldb) target create "/home/michristensen/scratch/cpp/threading/a.out" Current executable set to '/home/michristensen/scratch/cpp/threading/a.out' (x86_64). (lldb) b 18 Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`main + 80 at main.cpp:18:12, address = 0x0000000000000850 (lldb) run Process 215715 launched: '/home/michristensen/scratch/cpp/threading/a.out' (x86_64) This is a thread, i=1 This is a thread, i=2 This is a thread, i=3 This is a thread, i=4 This is a thread, i=5 Process 215715 stopped * thread #1, name = 'a.out', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x0000555555400850 a.out`main at main.cpp:18:12 15 for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { 16 pthread_create(&thread_ids[i], NULL, foo, NULL); 17 } -> 18 for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { 19 pthread_join(thread_ids[i], NULL); 20 } 21 return 0; (lldb) thread select 2 * thread #2, name = 'a.out' frame #0: 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72 libc.so.6`__nanosleep: -> 0x7ffff68f9918 <+72>: cmpq $-0x1000, %rax ; imm = 0xF000 0x7ffff68f991e <+78>: ja 0x7ffff68f9952 ; <+130> 0x7ffff68f9920 <+80>: movl %edx, %edi 0x7ffff68f9922 <+82>: movl %eax, 0xc(%rsp) (lldb) thread info thread #2: tid = 216047, 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72, name = 'a.out' (lldb) thread list Process 215715 stopped thread #1: tid = 215715, 0x0000555555400850 a.out`main at main.cpp:18:12, name = 'a.out', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * thread #2: tid = 216047, 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72, name = 'a.out' thread #3: tid = 216048, 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72, name = 'a.out' thread #4: tid = 216049, 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72, name = 'a.out' thread #5: tid = 216050, 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72, name = 'a.out' thread #6: tid = 216051, 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72, name = 'a.out' (lldb) thread select 215715 error: invalid thread #215715. (lldb) thread select -t 215715 * thread #1, name = 'a.out', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x0000555555400850 a.out`main at main.cpp:18:12 15 for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { 16 pthread_create(&thread_ids[i], NULL, foo, NULL); 17 } -> 18 for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { 19 pthread_join(thread_ids[i], NULL); 20 } 21 return 0; (lldb) thread select -t 216051 * thread #6, name = 'a.out' frame #0: 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72 libc.so.6`__nanosleep: -> 0x7ffff68f9918 <+72>: cmpq $-0x1000, %rax ; imm = 0xF000 0x7ffff68f991e <+78>: ja 0x7ffff68f9952 ; <+130> 0x7ffff68f9920 <+80>: movl %edx, %edi 0x7ffff68f9922 <+82>: movl %eax, 0xc(%rsp) (lldb) thread select 3 * thread #3, name = 'a.out' frame #0: 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72 libc.so.6`__nanosleep: -> 0x7ffff68f9918 <+72>: cmpq $-0x1000, %rax ; imm = 0xF000 0x7ffff68f991e <+78>: ja 0x7ffff68f9952 ; <+130> 0x7ffff68f9920 <+80>: movl %edx, %edi 0x7ffff68f9922 <+82>: movl %eax, 0xc(%rsp) (lldb) thread select -t 216048 * thread #3, name = 'a.out' frame #0: 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72 libc.so.6`__nanosleep: -> 0x7ffff68f9918 <+72>: cmpq $-0x1000, %rax ; imm = 0xF000 0x7ffff68f991e <+78>: ja 0x7ffff68f9952 ; <+130> 0x7ffff68f9920 <+80>: movl %edx, %edi 0x7ffff68f9922 <+82>: movl %eax, 0xc(%rsp) (lldb) thread select --thread_id 216048 * thread #3, name = 'a.out' frame #0: 0x00007ffff68f9918 libc.so.6`__nanosleep + 72 libc.so.6`__nanosleep: -> 0x7ffff68f9918 <+72>: cmpq $-0x1000, %rax ; imm = 0xF000 0x7ffff68f991e <+78>: ja 0x7ffff68f9952 ; <+130> 0x7ffff68f9920 <+80>: movl %edx, %edi 0x7ffff68f9922 <+82>: movl %eax, 0xc(%rsp) (lldb) help thread select Change the currently selected thread. Syntax: thread select <cmd-options> <thread-index> Command Options Usage: thread select [-t] <thread-index> -t ( --thread_id ) Provide a thread ID instead of a thread index. This command takes options and free-form arguments. If your arguments resemble option specifiers (i.e., they start with a - or --), you must use ' -- ' between the end of the command options and the beginning of the arguments. (lldb) c Process 215715 resuming Process 215715 exited with status = 0 (0x00000000) ```

Linalg op fusion (`Linalg/Transforms/Fusion.cpp`) used to generate invalid fused producer ops: ``` error: 'linalg.conv_2d_nhwc_hwcf' op expected type of operand #2 ('tensor<1x8x16x4xf32>') to match type of corresponding result ('tensor<?x?x?x?xf32>') note: see current operation: %24 = "linalg.conv_2d_nhwc_hwcf"(%21, %22, %23) <{dilations = dense<1> : tensor<2xi64>, operandSegmentSizes = array<i32: 2, 1>, strides = dense<2> : tensor<2xi64>}> ({ ^bb0(%arg9: f32, %arg10: f32, %arg11: f32): %28 = "arith.mulf"(%arg9, %arg10) <{fastmath = #arith.fastmath<none>}> : (f32, f32) -> f32 %29 = "arith.addf"(%arg11, %28) <{fastmath = #arith.fastmath<none>}> : (f32, f32) -> f32 "linalg.yield"(%29) : (f32) -> () }) {linalg.memoized_indexing_maps = [affine_map<(d0, d1, d2, d3, d4, d5, d6) -> (d0, d1 * 2 + d4, d2 * 2 + d5, d6)>, affine_map<(d0, d1, d2, d3, d4, d5, d6) -> (d4, d5, d6, d3)>, affine_map<(d0, d1, d2, d3, d4, d5, d6) -> (d0, d1, d2, d3)>]} : (tensor<1x?x?x3xf32>, tensor<3x3x3x4xf32>, tensor<1x8x16x4xf32>) -> tensor<?x?x?x?xf32> ``` This is a problem because the input IR to greedy pattern rewriter during `-test-linalg-greedy-fusion` is invalid. This commit fixes tests such as `mlir/test/Dialect/Linalg/tile-and-fuse-tensors.mlir` when verifying the IR after each pattern application (llvm#74270).

This has been flaky for a while, for example https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/50350 ``` Command Output (stdout): -- lldb version 18.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git revision 3974d89) clang revision 3974d89 llvm revision 3974d89 "can't evaluate expressions when the process is running." ``` ``` PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. #0 0x0000ffffa46191a0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x529a1a0) #1 0x0000ffffa4617144 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x5298144) #2 0x0000ffffa46198d0 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x529a8d0) #3 0x0000ffffab25b7dc (linux-vdso.so.1+0x7dc) #4 0x0000ffffab13d050 /build/glibc-Q8DG8B/glibc-2.31/string/../sysdeps/aarch64/multiarch/memcpy_advsimd.S:92:0 #5 0x0000ffffa446f420 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::PrivateSetRegisterValue(unsigned int, llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned char>) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f0420) #6 0x0000ffffa446f7b8 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::GetPrimordialRegister(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunicationClient&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f07b8) #7 0x0000ffffa446f308 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::ReadRegisterBytes(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f0308) #8 0x0000ffffa446ec1c lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::ReadRegister(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, lldb_private::RegisterValue&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50efc1c) #9 0x0000ffffa412eaa4 lldb_private::RegisterContext::ReadRegisterAsUnsigned(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, unsigned long) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4dafaa4) #10 0x0000ffffa420861c ReadLinuxProcessAddressMask(std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>, llvm::StringRef) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4e8961c) #11 0x0000ffffa4208430 ABISysV_arm64::FixCodeAddress(unsigned long) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4e89430) ``` Judging by the backtrace something is trying to read the pointer authentication address/code mask registers. This explains why I've not seen this issue locally, as the buildbot runs on Graviton 3 with has the pointer authentication extension. I will try to reproduce, fix and re-enable the test.

…vm#75394) Calling one of pthread join/detach interceptor on an already joined/detached thread causes asserts such as: AddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.cpp:56 "((t)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=1236094) #0 0x555555634f8b in __asan::CheckUnwind() compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:69:3 #1 0x55555564e06e in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cpp:86:24 #2 0x5555556491df in __sanitizer::ThreadArgRetval::BeforeJoin(unsigned long) const compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.cpp:56:3 #3 0x5555556198ed in Join<___interceptor_pthread_tryjoin_np(void*, void**)::<lambda()> > compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.h:74:26 #4 0x5555556198ed in pthread_tryjoin_np compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:311:29 The assert are replaced by error codes.

Add custom combine to lower load <3 x i8> as the more efficient sequence below: ldrb wX, [x0, #2] ldrh wY, [x0] orr wX, wY, wX, lsl #16 fmov s0, wX At the moment, there are almost no cases in which such vector operations will be generated automatically. The motivating case is non-power-of-2 SLP vectorization: llvm#77790

The concurrent tests all do a pthread_join at the end, and concurrent_base.py stops after that pthread_join and sanity checks that only 1 thread is running. On macOS, after pthread_join() has completed, there can be an extra thread still running which is completing the details of that task asynchronously; this causes testsuite failures. When this happens, we see the second thread is in ``` frame #0: 0x0000000180ce7700 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__ulock_wake + 8 frame #1: 0x0000000180d25ad4 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_joiner_wake + 52 frame #2: 0x0000000180d23c18 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_terminate + 384 frame #3: 0x0000000180d23a98 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_terminate_invoke + 92 frame #4: 0x0000000180d26740 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_exit + 112 frame #5: 0x0000000180d26040 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start + 148 ``` there are none of the functions from the test file present on this thread. In this patch, instead of counting the number of threads, I iterate over the threads looking for functions from our test file (by name) and only count threads that have at least one of them. It's a lower frequency failure than the darwin kernel bug causing an extra step instruction mach exception when hardware breakpoint/watchpoints are used, but once I fixed that, this came up as the next most common failure for these tests. rdar://110555062

@0

…lvm#80904)" This reverts commit b1ac052. This commit breaks coroutine splitting for non-swift calling convention functions. In this example: ```ll ; ModuleID = 'repro.ll' source_filename = "stdlib/test/runtime/test_llcl.mojo" target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" @0 = internal constant { i32, i32 } { i32 trunc (i64 sub (i64 ptrtoint (ptr @craSH to i64), i64 ptrtoint (ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, i32 }, ptr @0, i32 0, i32 1) to i64)) to i32), i32 64 } define dso_local void @af_suspend_fn(ptr %0, i64 %1, ptr %2) #0 { ret void } define dso_local void @craSH(ptr %0) #0 { %2 = call token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32 64, i32 8, i32 0, ptr @0) %3 = call ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token %2, ptr null) %4 = getelementptr inbounds { ptr, { ptr, ptr }, i64, { ptr, i1 }, i64, i64 }, ptr poison, i32 0, i32 0 %5 = call ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() store ptr %5, ptr %4, align 8 %6 = call { ptr, ptr, ptr } (i32, ptr, ptr, ...) @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32 0, ptr %5, ptr @ctxt_proj_fn, ptr @af_suspend_fn, ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison) ret void } define dso_local ptr @ctxt_proj_fn(ptr %0) #0 { ret ptr %0 } ; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind declare { ptr, ptr, ptr } @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32, ptr, ptr, ...) #1 ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32, i32, i32, ptr) #2 ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token, ptr writeonly) #2 ; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind declare ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() #1 attributes #0 = { "target-features"="+adx,+aes,+avx,+avx2,+bmi,+bmi2,+clflushopt,+clwb,+clzero,+crc32,+cx16,+cx8,+f16c,+fma,+fsgsbase,+fxsr,+invpcid,+lzcnt,+mmx,+movbe,+mwaitx,+pclmul,+pku,+popcnt,+prfchw,+rdpid,+rdpru,+rdrnd,+rdseed,+sahf,+sha,+sse,+sse2,+sse3,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+sse4a,+ssse3,+vaes,+vpclmulqdq,+wbnoinvd,+x87,+xsave,+xsavec,+xsaveopt,+xsaves" } attributes #1 = { nomerge nounwind } attributes #2 = { nounwind } ``` This verifier crashes after the `coro-split` pass with ``` cannot guarantee tail call due to mismatched parameter counts musttail call void @af_suspend_fn(ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison) LLVM ERROR: Broken function PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: opt ../../../reduced.ll -O0 #0 0x00007f1d89645c0e __interceptor_backtrace.part.0 /build/gcc-11-XeT9lY/gcc-11-11.4.0/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/asan/../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:4193:28 #1 0x0000556d94d254f7 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:22 #2 0x0000556d94d19a2f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:20 #3 0x0000556d94d1aa42 SignalHandler(int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:371:36 #4 0x00007f1d88e42520 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x42520) #5 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76 #6 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_internal ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78:10 #7 0x00007f1d88e969fc pthread_kill ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:89:10 #8 0x00007f1d88e42476 gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6 #9 0x00007f1d88e287f3 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #10 0x0000556d8944be01 std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>::size() const /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:919:40 #11 0x0000556d8944be01 bool std::operator==<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>(std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&, std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&) /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:1893:23 #12 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Array const&, llvm::json::Array const&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/JSON.h:572:69 #13 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Value const&, llvm::json::Value const&) (.cold) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/JSON.cpp:204:28 #14 0x0000556d949ed2bd llvm::report_fatal_error(char const*, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp:82:70 #15 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorBase<unsigned int>::size() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:91:32 #16 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorTemplateCommon<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, void>::end() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:282:41 #17 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVector<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, 4u>::~SmallVector() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1215:24 #18 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::~DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:413:7 #19 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoIROptimization::~DiagnosticInfoIROptimization() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:622:7 #20 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::OptimizationRemark::~OptimizationRemark() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:689:7 #21 0x0000556d8e37e876 operator() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2213:14 #22 0x0000556d8e37e876 emit<llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::CGSCCAnalysisManager&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&)::<lambda()> > /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/OptimizationRemarkEmitter.h:83:12 #23 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2212:13 #24 0x0000556d8c36ecb1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::CoroSplitPass, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #25 0x0000556d91c1a84f llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:90:12 #26 0x0000556d8c3690d1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #27 0x0000556d91c2162d llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:278:18 #28 0x0000556d8c369035 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #29 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20 #30 0x0000556d8e30979e llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroConditionalWrapper.cpp:19:74 #31 0x0000556d8c365755 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #32 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20 #33 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::isSmall() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:196:33 #34 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::~SmallPtrSetImplBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:84:17 #35 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImpl<llvm::AnalysisKey*>::~SmallPtrSetImpl() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:321:7 #36 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::AnalysisKey*, 2u>::~SmallPtrSet() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:427:7 #37 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::PreservedAnalyses::~PreservedAnalyses() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Analysis.h:109:7 #38 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::PassPlugin>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::function<void (llvm::PassBuilder&)>>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:532:10 #39 0x0000556d897e3939 optMain /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/optdriver.cpp:737:27 #40 0x0000556d89455461 main /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:25:33 #41 0x00007f1d88e29d90 __libc_start_call_main ./csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 #42 0x00007f1d88e29e40 call_init ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:128:20 llvm#43 0x00007f1d88e29e40 __libc_start_main ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:379:5 #44 0x0000556d897b6335 _start (/home/ubuntu/modular/.derived/third-party/llvm-project/build-relwithdebinfo-asan/bin/opt+0x150c335) Aborted (core dumped)

…ter partial ordering when determining primary template (llvm#82417) Consider the following: ``` struct A { static constexpr bool x = true; }; template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U) noexcept(T::y); // #1, error: no member named 'y' in 'A' template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::x); // #2 template<> void f(A, int*) noexcept; // explicit specialization of #2 ``` We currently instantiate the exception specification of all candidate function template specializations when deducting template arguments for an explicit specialization, which results in a error despite `#1` not being selected by partial ordering as the most specialized template. According to [except.spec] p13: > An exception specification is considered to be needed when: > - [...] > - the exception specification is compared to that of another declaration (e.g., an explicit specialization or an overriding virtual function); Assuming that "comparing declarations" means "determining whether the declarations correspond and declare the same entity" (per [basic.scope.scope] p4 and [basic.link] p11.1, respectively), the exception specification does _not_ need to be instantiated until _after_ partial ordering, at which point we determine whether the implicitly instantiated specialization and the explicit specialization declare the same entity (the determination of whether two functions/function templates correspond does not consider the exception specifications). This patch defers the instantiation of the exception specification until a single function template specialization is selected via partial ordering, matching the behavior of GCC, EDG, and MSVC: see https://godbolt.org/z/Ebb6GTcWE.

TestCases/Misc/Linux/sigaction.cpp fails because dlsym() may call malloc on failure. And then the wrapped malloc appears to access thread local storage using global dynamic accesses, thus calling ___interceptor___tls_get_addr, before REAL(__tls_get_addr) has been set, so we get a crash inside ___interceptor___tls_get_addr. For example, this can happen when looking up __isoc23_scanf which might not exist in some libcs. Fix this by marking the thread local variable accessed inside the debug checks as "initial-exec", which does not require __tls_get_addr. This is probably a better alternative to llvm#83886. This fixes a different crash but is related to llvm#46204. Backtrace: ``` #0 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #1 0x00007ffff6a9d89e in ___interceptor___tls_get_addr (arg=0x7ffff6b27be8) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:2759 #2 0x00007ffff6a46bc6 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::LockImpl (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, pc=140737331846066) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.cpp:218 #3 0x00007ffff6a448b2 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::Lock (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, this@entry=0x730000000580) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:129 #4 __sanitizer::Mutex::Lock (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, this@entry=0x730000000580) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:167 #5 0x00007ffff6abdbb2 in __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock (mu=0x730000000580, this=<optimized out>) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:383 #6 __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64>::GetFromAllocator (this=0x7ffff7487dc0 <__tsan::allocator_placeholder>, stat=stat@entry=0x7ffff570db68, class_id=11, chunks=chunks@entry=0x7ffff5702cc8, n_chunks=n_chunks@entry=128) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_primary64.h:207 #7 0x00007ffff6abdaa0 in __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64LocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64> >::Refill (this=<optimized out>, c=c@entry=0x7ffff5702cb8, allocator=<optimized out>, class_id=<optimized out>) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_local_cache.h:103 #8 0x00007ffff6abd731 in __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64LocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64> >::Allocate (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, allocator=0x7ffff5702cc8, class_id=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_local_cache.h:39 #9 0x00007ffff6abc397 in __sanitizer::CombinedAllocator<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64>, __sanitizer::LargeMmapAllocatorPtrArrayDynamic>::Allocate (this=0x7ffff5702cc8, cache=0x7ffff6b27be8, size=<optimized out>, size@entry=175, alignment=alignment@entry=16) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_combined.h:69 #10 0x00007ffff6abaa6a in __tsan::user_alloc_internal (thr=0x7ffff7ebd980, pc=140737331499943, sz=sz@entry=175, align=align@entry=16, signal=true) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_mman.cpp:198 #11 0x00007ffff6abb0d1 in __tsan::user_alloc (thr=0x7ffff6b27be8, pc=140737331846066, sz=11, sz@entry=175) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_mman.cpp:223 #12 0x00007ffff6a693b5 in ___interceptor_malloc (size=175) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:666 #13 0x00007ffff7fce7f2 in malloc (size=175) at ../include/rtld-malloc.h:56 #14 __GI__dl_exception_create_format (exception=exception@entry=0x7fffffffd0d0, objname=0x7ffff7fc3550 "/path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/cmake-build-all-sanitizers/lib/linux/libclang_rt.tsan-x86_64.so", fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ffff7ff2db9 "undefined symbol: %s%s%s") at ./elf/dl-exception.c:157 #15 0x00007ffff7fd50e8 in _dl_lookup_symbol_x (undef_name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", undef_map=<optimized out>, ref=0x7fffffffd148, symbol_scope=<optimized out>, version=<optimized out>, type_class=0, flags=2, skip_map=0x7ffff7fc35e0) at ./elf/dl-lookup.c:793 --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- #16 0x00007ffff656d6ed in do_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", who=0x7ffff6a3bb84 <__interception::InterceptFunction(char const*, unsigned long*, unsigned long, unsigned long)+36>, vers=vers@entry=0x0, flags=flags@entry=2) at ./elf/dl-sym.c:146 #17 0x00007ffff656d9dd in _dl_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, who=<optimized out>) at ./elf/dl-sym.c:195 #18 0x00007ffff64a2854 in dlsym_doit (a=a@entry=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:40 #19 0x00007ffff7fcc489 in __GI__dl_catch_exception (exception=exception@entry=0x7fffffffd310, operate=0x7ffff64a2840 <dlsym_doit>, args=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:237 #20 0x00007ffff7fcc5af in _dl_catch_error (objname=0x7fffffffd368, errstring=0x7fffffffd370, mallocedp=0x7fffffffd367, operate=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:256 #21 0x00007ffff64a2257 in _dlerror_run (operate=operate@entry=0x7ffff64a2840 <dlsym_doit>, args=args@entry=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./dlfcn/dlerror.c:138 #22 0x00007ffff64a28e5 in dlsym_implementation (dl_caller=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, handle=<optimized out>) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:54 #23 ___dlsym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:68 #24 0x00007ffff6a3bb84 in __interception::GetFuncAddr (name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", trampoline=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:42 #25 __interception::InterceptFunction (name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", ptr_to_real=0x7ffff74850e8 <__interception::real___isoc23_scanf>, func=11, trampoline=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:61 #26 0x00007ffff6a9f2d9 in InitializeCommonInterceptors () at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:10315 ``` Reviewed By: vitalybuka, MaskRay Pull Request: llvm#83890

…lvm#85653) This reverts commit daebe5c. This commit causes the following asan issue: ``` <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/mlir-opt <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir | <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/FileCheck <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir # executed command: <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/mlir-opt <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir # .---command stderr------------ # | ================================================================= # | ==2772558==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7fd2c2c42b90 at pc 0x55e406d54614 bp 0x7ffc810e4070 sp 0x7ffc810e4068 # | READ of size 8 at 0x7fd2c2c42b90 thread T0 # | #0 0x55e406d54613 in operator()<long int const*> /usr/include/c++/13/bits/predefined_ops.h:318 # | #1 0x55e406d54613 in __count_if<long int const*, __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<mlir::verifyListOfOperandsOrIntegers(Operation*, llvm::StringRef, unsigned int, llvm::ArrayRef<long int>, ValueRange)::<lambda(int64_t)> > > /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_algobase.h:2125 # | #2 0x55e406d54613 in count_if<long int const*, mlir::verifyListOfOperandsOrIntegers(Operation*, ... ```

…oint. (llvm#83821)" This reverts commit c2c1e6e. It creates a use after free. ==8342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x50f000001760 at pc 0x55b9fb84a8fb bp 0x7ffc18468a10 sp 0x7ffc18468a08 READ of size 1 at 0x50f000001760 thread T0 #0 0x55b9fb84a8fa in dropPoisonGeneratingFlags llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.h:1040:13 #1 0x55b9fb84a8fa in llvm::VPlanTransforms::dropPoisonGeneratingRecipes(llvm::VPlan&, llvm::function_ref<bool (llvm::BasicBlock*)>)::$_0::operator()(llvm::VPRecipeBase*) const llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp:1236:23 #2 0x55b9fb84a196 in llvm::VPlanTransforms::dropPoisonGeneratingRecipes(llvm::VPlan&, llvm::function_ref<bool (llvm::BasicBlock*)>) llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp Can be reproduced with asan on Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-interleaved-masked-accesses.ll Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr81872.ll Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/x86-interleaved-accesses-masked-group.ll

…e exception specification of a function (llvm#90760) [temp.deduct.general] p6 states: > At certain points in the template argument deduction process it is necessary to take a function type that makes use of template parameters and replace those template parameters with the corresponding template arguments. This is done at the beginning of template argument deduction when any explicitly specified template arguments are substituted into the function type, and again at the end of template argument deduction when any template arguments that were deduced or obtained from default arguments are substituted. [temp.deduct.general] p7 goes on to say: > The _deduction substitution loci_ are > - the function type outside of the _noexcept-specifier_, > - the explicit-specifier, > - the template parameter declarations, and > - the template argument list of a partial specialization > > The substitution occurs in all types and expressions that are used in the deduction substitution loci. [...] Consider the following: ```cpp struct A { static constexpr bool x = true; }; template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U) noexcept(T::x); // #1 template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::y); // #2 template<> void f<A>(A, int*) noexcept; // clang currently accepts, GCC and EDG reject ``` Currently, `Sema::SubstituteExplicitTemplateArguments` will substitute into the _noexcept-specifier_ when deducing template arguments from a function declaration or when deducing template arguments for taking the address of a function template (and the substitution is treated as a SFINAE context). In the above example, `#1` is selected as the primary template because substitution of the explicit template arguments into the _noexcept-specifier_ of `#2` failed, which resulted in the candidate being ignored. This behavior is incorrect ([temp.deduct.general] note 4 says as much), and this patch corrects it by deferring all substitution into the _noexcept-specifier_ until it is instantiated. As part of the necessary changes to make this patch work, the instantiation of the exception specification of a function template specialization when taking the address of a function template is changed to only occur for the function selected by overload resolution per [except.spec] p13.1 (as opposed to being instantiated for every candidate).

…ined member functions & member function templates (llvm#88963) Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector: ``` template<typename T> concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long); template<typename T> struct A { template<typename U> void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template void g() requires C<T>; // #2, declares a function template<> void f(char); // #3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function }; template<> template<typename U> void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // #4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template template<> template<> void A<int>::f(int); // #5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template<> void A<long>::g(); // #6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function ``` A number of problems exist: - Clang rejects `#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U` substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated function template. - Clang rejects `#5` because the function template specialization instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `#5` does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function). - Clang rejects `#6` for the same reasons it rejects `#5`. This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes: - To fix `#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed `FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_ of `#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`. - To fix `#5` and `#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared for explicit specializations that declare functions. In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we previously would select the first function that has the same type as the explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we match EDG's behavior for these declarations.

...which caused issues like > ==42==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x32 (50) bytes at address 0x117e0000 (error code: 28) > ==42==Cannot dump memory map on emscriptenAddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_common.cpp:81 "((0 && "unable to unmmap")) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=288045824) > #0 0x14f73b0c in __asan::CheckUnwind()+0x14f73b0c (this.program+0x14f73b0c) > #1 0x14f8a3c2 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long)+0x14f8a3c2 (this.program+0x14f8a3c2) > #2 0x14f7d6e1 in __sanitizer::ReportMunmapFailureAndDie(void*, unsigned long, int, bool)+0x14f7d6e1 (this.program+0x14f7d6e1) > #3 0x14f81fbd in __sanitizer::UnmapOrDie(void*, unsigned long)+0x14f81fbd (this.program+0x14f81fbd) > #4 0x14f875df in __sanitizer::SuppressionContext::ParseFromFile(char const*)+0x14f875df (this.program+0x14f875df) > #5 0x14f74eab in __asan::InitializeSuppressions()+0x14f74eab (this.program+0x14f74eab) > #6 0x14f73a1a in __asan::AsanInitInternal()+0x14f73a1a (this.program+0x14f73a1a) when trying to use an ASan suppressions file under Emscripten: Even though it would be considered OK by SUSv4, the Emscripten runtime states "We don't support partial munmapping" (see <emscripten-core/emscripten@f4115eb> "Implement MAP_ANONYMOUS on top of malloc in STANDALONE_WASM mode (llvm#16289)"). Co-authored-by: Stephan Bergmann <stephan.bergmann@allotropia.de>

…ication as used during partial ordering (llvm#91534) We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification when determining the primary template of a function template specialization or when taking the address of a function template. Therefore, this patch changes `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs` such that we do not mark template parameters in the exception specification as 'used' during partial ordering (per [temp.deduct.partial] p12) to prevent the following from being ambiguous: ``` template<typename T, typename U> void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1 template<typename T> void f(T*) noexcept; // #2 template<> void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // currently ambiguous, selects #2 with this patch applied ``` Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard (see core issue filed here cplusplus/CWG#537), this seems to be the intended behavior given the definition of _deduction substitution loci_ in [temp.deduct.general] p7 (and EDG does the same thing).

…erSize (llvm#67657)" This reverts commit f0b3654. This commit triggers UB by reading an uninitialized variable. `UP.PartialThreshold` is used uninitialized in `getUnrollingPreferences()` when it is called from `LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan()`. In this case the `UP` variable is created on the stack and its fields are not initialized. ``` ==8802==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x557c0b081b99 in llvm::BasicTTIImplBase<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h #1 0x557c0b07a40c in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::Model<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h:2277:17 #2 0x557c0f5d69ee in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) const llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.cpp:387:19 #3 0x557c0e6b96a0 in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7624:7 #4 0x557c0e6e4b63 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(llvm::Loop*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10253:13 #5 0x557c0e6f2429 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::runImpl(llvm::Function&, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::LoopInfo&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo&, llvm::DominatorTree&, llvm::BlockFrequencyInfo*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfo*, llvm::DemandedBits&, llvm::AssumptionCache&, llvm::LoopAccessInfoManager&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter&, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10344:30 #6 0x557c0e6f2f97 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::run(llvm::Function&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Function>&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10383:9 [...] Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'UP' in the stack frame #0 0x557c0e6b961e in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7623:3 ```

…vm#90820) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, a template template parameter containing no packs should be more specialized than one that does. Given the following example: ```C++ template<class T2> struct A; template<template<class ...T3s> class TT1, class T4> struct A<TT1<T4>>; // #1 template<template<class T5 > class TT2, class T6> struct A<TT2<T6>>; // #2 template<class T1> struct B; template struct A<B<char>>; ``` Prior to P0522, candidate `#2` would be more specialized. After P0522, neither is more specialized, so this becomes ambiguous. With this change, `#2` becomes more specialized again, maintaining compatibility with pre-P0522 implementations. The problem is that in P0522, candidates are at least as specialized when matching packs to fixed-size lists both ways, whereas before, a fixed-size list is more specialized. This patch keeps the original behavior when checking template arguments outside deduction, but restores this aspect of pre-P0522 matching during deduction. --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.

…arallel fusion llvm#94391 (llvm#97607)" This reverts commit edbc0e3. Reason for rollback. ASAN complains about this PR: ==4320==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x502000006cd8 at pc 0x55e2978d63cf bp 0x7ffe6431c2b0 sp 0x7ffe6431c2a8 READ of size 8 at 0x502000006cd8 thread T0 #0 0x55e2978d63ce in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 #1 0x55e2978d63ce in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:156:11 #2 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43 #3 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17 #4 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #5 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #6 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #7 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15 #8 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10 #9 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #10 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #11 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #12 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16 #13 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10 #14 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16 #15 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17 #16 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #17 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #18 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7 #19 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21 #20 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16 #21 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10 #22 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60 #23 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17 #24 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 #25 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 #26 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #27 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #28 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 #29 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 #30 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 #31 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 #32 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 #33 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 #34 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10 #35 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33 #36 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94) #37 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 0x502000006cd8 is located 8 bytes inside of 16-byte region [0x502000006cd0,0x502000006ce0) freed by thread T0 here: #0 0x55e29130b7e2 in operator delete(void*, unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:155:3 #1 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_operator_delete<void *, unsigned long> #2 0x55e2979eb657 in __do_deallocate_handle_size<> #3 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_deallocate #4 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate #5 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate #6 0x55e2979eb657 in operator() #7 0x55e2979eb657 in ~vector #8 0x55e2979eb657 in mlir::Block::~Block() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:24:1 #9 0x55e2979ebc17 in deleteNode llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:42:39 #10 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:205:5 #11 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:209:39 #12 0x55e2979ebc17 in mlir::Block::erase() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:67:28 #13 0x55e297aef978 in mlir::RewriterBase::eraseBlock(mlir::Block*) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:245:10 #14 0x55e297af0563 in mlir::RewriterBase::inlineBlockBefore(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<mlir::Operation, false, false, void, false, void>, false, false>, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:331:3 #15 0x55e297af06d8 in mlir::RewriterBase::mergeBlocks(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:341:3 #16 0x55e297036608 in mlir::scf::ForOp::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:575:12 #17 0x55e2970673ca in mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::scf::ForOp>::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.h.inc:658:56 #18 0x55e2978d5feb in replaceWithAdditionalYields blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp.inc:105:14 #19 0x55e2978d5feb in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:135:14 #20 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43 #21 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17 #22 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #23 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #24 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #25 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15 #26 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10 #27 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #28 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #29 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #30 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16 #31 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10 #32 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16 #33 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17 #34 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #35 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #36 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7 #37 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21 #38 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16 #39 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10 #40 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60 #41 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17 #42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 llvm#43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 #44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 #47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 #48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 llvm#49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 llvm#50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 llvm#51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 previously allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x55e29130ab5d in operator new(unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:86:3 #1 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_operator_new<unsigned long> #2 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_allocate #3 0x55e2979ed5d4 in allocate #4 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __allocate_at_least<std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > #5 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __split_buffer #6 0x55e2979ed5d4 in mlir::BlockArgument* std::__u::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>>::__push_back_slow_path<mlir::BlockArgument const&>(mlir::BlockArgument const&) #7 0x55e2979ec0f2 in push_back #8 0x55e2979ec0f2 in mlir::Block::addArgument(mlir::Type, mlir::Location) mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:154:13 #9 0x55e29796e457 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2172:34 #10 0x55e29796e457 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7 #11 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16 #12 0x55e297035742 in mlir::scf::ForOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:521:14 #13 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12 #14 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12 #15 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #16 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #17 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9 #18 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19 #19 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10 #20 0x55e297971d20 in parseBlockBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2296:9 #21 0x55e297971d20 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseBlock(mlir::Block*&) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2226:12 #22 0x55e29796e4f5 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2184:7 #23 0x55e29796e4f5 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7 #24 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16 #25 0x55e29796b2cf in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseOptionalRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1796:12 #26 0x55e2978d89ff in mlir::function_interface_impl::parseFunctionOp(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&, bool, mlir::StringAttr, llvm::function_ref<mlir::Type (mlir::Builder&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, mlir::function_interface_impl::VariadicFlag, std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>&)>, mlir::StringAttr, mlir::StringAttr) mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionImplementation.cpp:232:14 #27 0x55e2969ba41d in mlir::func::FuncOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Func/IR/FuncOps.cpp:203:10 #28 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12 #29 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12 #30 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #31 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #32 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9 #33 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19 #34 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10 #35 0x55e297959b78 in parse mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2725:20 #36 0x55e297959b78 in mlir::parseAsmSourceFile(llvm::SourceMgr const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::AsmParserState*, mlir::AsmParserCodeCompleteContext*) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2785:41 #37 0x55e29790d5c2 in mlir::parseSourceFile(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::LocationAttr*) mlir/lib/Parser/Parser.cpp:46:10 #38 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp, const std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> &> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:159:14 #39 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:189:10 #40 0x55e291ebbfe2 in mlir::parseSourceFileForTool(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::ParserConfig const&, bool) mlir/include/mlir/Tools/ParseUtilities.h:31:12 #41 0x55e291ebb263 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:383:33 #42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 llvm#43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 #44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 #47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 #48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 llvm#49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 llvm#50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 llvm#51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 llvm#52 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10 llvm#53 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33 llvm#54 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94) llvm#55 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x502000006a00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006a80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 0x502000006b00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006b80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 0x502000006c00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa fd fa =>0x502000006c80: fa fa fd fa fa fa fd fd fa fa fd[fd]fa fa fd fd 0x502000006d00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006d80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006e00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006e80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006f00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb ==4320==ABORTING

…lvm#104148) `hasOperands` does not always execute matchers in the order they are written. This can cause issue in code using bindings when one operand matcher is relying on a binding set by the other. With this change, the first matcher present in the code is always executed first and any binding it sets are available to the second matcher. Simple example with current version (1 match) and new version (2 matches): ```bash > cat tmp.cpp int a = 13; int b = ((int) a) - a; int c = a - ((int) a); > clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here int a = 13; ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here int b = ((int)a) - a; ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 match. > ./build/bin/clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here 2 | int b = ((int)a) - a; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ Match #2: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:3:9: note: "root" binds here 3 | int c = a - ((int)a); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 matches. ``` If this should be documented or regression tested anywhere please let me know where.

…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ```

) Currently, process of replacing bitwise operations consisting of `LSR`/`LSL` with `And` is performed by `DAGCombiner`. However, in certain cases, the `AND` generated by this process can be removed. Consider following case: ``` lsr x8, x8, llvm#56 and x8, x8, #0xfc ldr w0, [x2, x8] ret ``` In this case, we can remove the `AND` by changing the target of `LDR` to `[X2, X8, LSL #2]` and right-shifting amount change to 56 to 58. after changed: ``` lsr x8, x8, llvm#58 ldr w0, [x2, x8, lsl #2] ret ``` This patch checks to see if the `SHIFTING` + `AND` operation on load target can be optimized and optimizes it if it can.

boomanaiden154 force-pushed the regalloc-all-instructions branch from 7ef3f06 to e6f6b6e Compare June 23, 2022 22:15

Worked on regalloc all features

c9829cd

boomanaiden154 force-pushed the regalloc-all-instructions branch from e6f6b6e to c9829cd Compare June 24, 2022 02:25