Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
docs: add the overview of architecture && cross chain (#67)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
unclezoro committed Feb 20, 2023
1 parent f72b8a3 commit 0b9eb07
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 8 changed files with 288 additions and 2 deletions.
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions .github/workflows/e2e-test.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ jobs:
cat ./deployment/localup/.env
- name: run local chain
run: bash ./deployment/localup/localup.sh all 1 1
- name: check sp
run: bash ./deployment/localup/localup.sh sp_check 1 1
- name: run e2e test
run: |
make e2e_test
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion docs/architecture/01-framework.md

This file was deleted.

110 changes: 110 additions & 0 deletions docs/architecture/01-overview.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
# Overview

BNB Greenfield blockchain uses Proof-of-Stake based on Tendermint-consensus for its own network security. Blocks are
created every 2 seconds on the Greenfield chain by a group of validators.

BNB will be the gas and governance token on this blockchain. There is a native cross-chain bridge between the Greenfield
blockchain and BSC. The initial BNB will be locked on BSC and re-minted on Greenfield. BNB and data operation primitives
can flow between Greenfield and BSC.

Total circulation of BNB will stay unchanged as it is now but flow among BNB Beacon Chain, BSC, and Greenfield.

The validator election and governance are based on a proposal-vote mechanism, which is revised based on Cosmos SDK's
governance module: anyone can create and propose to become a validator, and the election into the active set will be
based on the stake ranking (initially new validators may request the existing validator set's votes to be qualified for
election). As validators will host all the critical metadata and respond to all data operation transactions, they should
run professionally in terms of performance and stability.

To facilitate cross-chain operation and convenient asset management, the address format of the Greenfield blockchain
will be fully compatible with BSC (and Ethereum). It also accepts EIP712 transaction signing and verification. These
enable the existing wallet infrastructure to interact with Greenfield at the beginning naturally.

## Ecosystem Players
There are several player roles for the whole Greenfield ecosystem.

<div align="center"><img src="../asset/01-All%20Players%20of%20Greenfield.jpg" height="80%" width="80%"></div>
<div align="center"><i>Figure All Players of Greenfield</i></div>

### Greenfield Validators

As a PoS blockchain, the Greenfield blockchain has its own validators.
These validators are elected based on the Proof-of-Stake logic.

These validators are responsible for the security of the Greenfield
blockchain. They get involved in the governance and staking of the
blockchain. They form a P2P network that is similar to other PoS
blockchain networks.

Meanwhile, they accept and process transactions to allow users to
operate their objects stored on Greenfield. They maintain the metadata
of Greenfield as the blockchain state, which is the control panel for
both Storage Providers (SPs) and users. These two parties use and update
these states to operate the object storage.

Greenfield validators also have the obligation to run the relayer system
for cross-chain communication with BSC.

The network topology of Greenfield validators is similar to the existing
secure validator setup of PoS blockchains. "Sentry Nodes" are used to
defend against DDoS and provide a secure private network, as shown in
the below diagram.

<div align="center"><img src="../asset/02-Greenfield%20Blockchain%20Network.jpg" height="80%" width="80%"></div>
<div align="center"><i>Figure Greenfield Blockchain Network</i></div>

### Storage Providers (SPs)

Storage Providers are professional individuals and organizations who run
a series of services to provide data services based on the Greenfield
blockchain.

### Greenfield dApps

Greenfield dApps are applications that provide functions based on
Greenfield storage and its related economic traits to solve some
problems of their users.

## Greenfield Blockchain Data Storage
All Greenfield validators have such active data in full (at least the latest state). Anyone can join the blockchain as
full nodes to synchronize these data for free.

These data are on-chain and can be only changed through transactions onto the Greenfield blockchain. It has several types
as described below.

### Accounts and Balance
Each user has their "Owner Address" as the identifier for their owner account to "own" the data resources. There is
another "payment account" type dedicated to billing and payment purposes and owned by owner addresses.

Both owner accounts and payment accounts can hold the BNB balance on Greenfield. Users can deposit BNB from BSC, accept
transfers from other users, and spend them on transaction gas and storage usage.

### Validator and SP Metadata
These are the basic information about the Greenfield validators and Greenfield SPs. SPs may have more information, as
it has to publish their service information for users' data operations. There should be a reputation mechanism for SPs
as well.

### Storage Metadata
The "storage metadata" includes size, ownership, checksum hashes, and distribution location among SPs. Similar to AWS S3,
the basic unit of the storage is an "object", which can be a piece of binary data, text files, photos, videos, or any
other format. Users can create their objects under their "bucket". A bucket is globally unique. The object can be referred
to via the bucket name and the object ID. It can also be located by the bucket name, the prefix tag, and the object ID
via off-chain facilitations.

### Permission Metadata
Data resources on Greenfield, such as the data objects and the buckets, all have access control, such as which address
can create, read, list, or even execute the resources, and which address can grant/revoke these permissions.

Two other data resources also have access control. One is "Group". A group represents a group of user addresses that have
the same permissions to the same resources. It can be used in the same way as an address in the access control. Meanwhile,
it requires permission too to change the group. The other is "payment account". They are created by the owner accounts.

Here the access control is enforced by the SPs off-chain. People can test and challenge the SPs if they mess up the
control. Slash and reward will happen to keep the SPs sticking to the principles.

### Billing Metadata
Users have to pay fees to store data objects on Greenfield. While each object enjoys a free quota to download by users
who are permitted to, the excessive download will require extra data packages to be paid for the bandwidth. Besides
the owner address, users can derive multiple "Payment Addresses" to pay these fees. Objects are stored under buckets,
while each bucket can be associated with these payment addresses, and the system will charge these accounts for storing
and/or downloading. Many buckets can share the same payment address. Such association information is also stored on
chains with consensus as well.
175 changes: 175 additions & 0 deletions docs/architecture/07-cross-chain.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
# Cross Chain

The real power of the Greenfield ecosystem lies in that the platform is not only designed to store the data, but also to
support the creation of value based on the data assets and its related economy.

The asset traits of the data are firstly established on the permissions, e.g. the permission to read the data. When
this right is disconnected from the data itself, they become tradable assets and enlarge the value of the data. This
can be amplified when the data itself can be executable (a new type of "Smart Code"), interact with each other, and
generate new data. This creates a lot of room to imagine building a new, data-intensive, trustless computing environment.

Secondly, the data permissions can be transferred cross-chain onto BSC and become digital assets there. This creates a
variety of possibilities to integrate these assets with the existing DeFi protocols and models on BSC.

This gets even further enhanced by the smart contracts on BSC, which enjoy the same address format as accounts on the
Greenfield blockchain and can be the owners of the data objects and inherit different permissions. This will unleash
many new business opportunities based on the data and its operations.

## Cross-Chain with BSC

The cross-chain model expects to achieve the following goals:

- integratable with the existing systems: try to reuse the current
infrastructure and dApps as much as possible, such as NFT
Marketplace, data indexing, and blockchain explorers.

- programmable: dApps can define how they want to wrap the assets from Greenfield.

- secure and recoverable.

The native cross-chain bridge is maintained and secured by the
validators of Greenfield, via a new relayer system based on an
aggregated multisig scheme (more details in the later sections).
Greenfield validators will run the relayers to facilitate the high
bandwidth and fast bridge.

BNB will be transferred from BSC to Greenfield as the first cross-chain
action. The initial validator set of Greenfield at the genesis will
first lock a certain amount of BNB into the "Greenfield Token Hub"
contract on BSC. This contract will also be used as part of the native
bridge for BNB transferring after the genesis. These initial locked BNB
will be used as the self-stake of validators and early days gas fees.

## Framework

<div align="center"><img src="../asset/03-Cross-chain%20Architecture.jpg" height="80%" width="80%"></div>
<div align="center"><i>Figure Cross-chain Architecture</i></div>

The bottom layer is a cross-chain **Communication Layer**, which focuses
on primitive communication package handling and verification. The middle
layer implements the **Resource Mirror**. It is responsible for managing
the resource assets that are defined on Greenfield but mirrored onto
BSC. The top layer is the **Application Layer**, which are the smart
contracts implemented by community developers on BSC to operate the
mirrored resource entities with their primitives; Greenfield does not have
such an application layer since itself does not provide programmability yet.
The real dApps will have some part in this Application Layer and also
interact with Greenfield Core and all sorts of supporting infrastructures.

Because of the asymmetric framework, BSC focuses more on the
application/control plane, while Greenfield is the data plane. To avoid
state racing, the following rules are introduced:

- Any resources that are initiated to create by BSC can only be controlled by BSC.

- Any resources that are controlled by BSC can not transfer control rights to Greenfield.

- Any resources that are controlled by Greenfield can transfer control rights to BSC.

## Communication Layer

The communication layer is composed of a set of **Greenfield Relayers**:

- Each validator should run a relayer. Each relayer possesses a BLS
private key, with the address of the key stored on-chain as part
of the validator's mandatory information.

- The relayer watches all cross-chain events happen on BSC and the
Greenfield blockchain independently. After enough blocks of
confirmation to reach finality, the relayer will sign a message by
the BLS key to confirm the events, and broadcast the signing
attestment, which is called "the vote", through a p2p network to
other relayers.

- Once enough votes from the relayer are collected, the relayer will
assemble a cross-chain package transaction and submit it to BSC or
Greenfield network.

## Resource Mirror Layer

### Resource Entity Mirror

The purposes of almost all the cross-chain packages are to change the
state of the resource entities on the Greenfield blockchain. Thus the
below resource entities should be able to be mirrored on BSC:

1. Account

2. BNB

3. Bucket

4. Object

5. Group

The account mapping is natural: as BSC and Greenfield use the same
address scheme. The same address values on both sides mean the same
account. They do not require an actual mirror.

BNB is a natively pegged token from the genesis of Greenfield. The
"Token Hub" contract is a smart contract built on BSC to ensure
that Greenfield cannot inflate BNB and secure the total circulation of
BNB.

Bucket, Object, and Group are mirrored onto BSC as NFTs of a new BEP
revised from the ERC-721 standard. These NFTs have corresponding
metadata information for the resources. The ownerships of the NFTs on
BSC stand for the ownerships of these resources on Greenfield. As these
ownerships are not transferable on Greenfield, these NFTs are not
transferable on BSC.

### Cross-Chain Operating Primitives

A few series of cross-chain primitives are defined for dApps to call to
operate on these resource entities.

It is worth highlighting that smart contracts can call these primitives
in a similar way as EOAs.

Accounts

- create payment accounts on BSC

BNB:

- transfer bidirectionally between BSC and Greenfield among accounts
(including even payment accounts)

Bucket:

- create a bucket on BSC

- mirror bucket from Greenfield to BSC

Object:

- mirror object from Greenfield to BSC

- create an object on BSC

- grant/revoke permissions of objects on BSC to accounts/groups

- copy objects on BSC

- Kick off the execution of an object on BSC

- associate buckets to payment accounts on BSC

Group:

- mirror group from Greenfield to BSC

- create a group on BSC

- change group members on BSC

- leave a group on BSC

Once these primitives are called by EOA or smart contracts, the
predefined events will be emitted. Greenfield Relayers should pick up
these events and relay them over to Greenfield and BSC. As the change
will happen asynchronously, there will be specific cross-chain packages
for acknowledgments or errors, which can trigger a callback. The caller
of the primitives should pay the fees upfront for cross-chain operations
and also for the potential callback. More details are discussed in Part 3.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/architecture/readme.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ This section dives into the internals of the Greenfield Blockchain implementatio

### Table of Contents

- [Framework](./01-framework.md)
- [Overview](./01-overview.md)
- [Key Management](./02-key_management.md)
- [Token Economics](./03-token_economics.md)
- [Storage Provider Management](./04-storage_provider_management.md)
Expand Down
Binary file added docs/asset/01-All Players of Greenfield.jpg
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Binary file added docs/asset/02-Greenfield Blockchain Network.jpg
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Binary file added docs/asset/03-Cross-chain Architecture.jpg
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.

0 comments on commit 0b9eb07

Please sign in to comment.