Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add user words to transceiver wires #731

Merged

Conversation

martijnbastiaan
Copy link
Contributor

@martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan commented Mar 4, 2025

Allows for accessing data at top entity boundaries. Prepares for a multi-node simulation including transceiver data (not just clock signals).

@martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan force-pushed the martijn/add-user-words-to-transceiver-wires branch from 7dd2626 to 382a019 Compare March 4, 2025 16:26
@martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan force-pushed the martijn/add-user-words-to-transceiver-wires branch from 382a019 to c84ad80 Compare March 4, 2025 19:42
Allows for accessing data at top entity boundaries. Prepares for a
multi-node simulation including transceivers.
@martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan force-pushed the martijn/add-user-words-to-transceiver-wires branch from c84ad80 to 7a117af Compare March 6, 2025 12:09
Copy link
Contributor

@hiddemoll hiddemoll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No remarks other than a typo

Keeping this as a separate commit to make sure we keep the original
problematic code around in case someone wants to take a look at the
issue.
@martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan force-pushed the martijn/add-user-words-to-transceiver-wires branch from 50a143a to 6b537d9 Compare March 6, 2025 15:47
@martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan merged commit 860e100 into staging Mar 6, 2025
26 checks passed
@martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan deleted the martijn/add-user-words-to-transceiver-wires branch March 6, 2025 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants