-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
quick fixes #153
Merged
Merged
quick fixes #153
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -226,6 +226,9 @@ def wait_on_job_ids(self, job_ids, callback=None): | |
# them before returning, optionally submitting callbacks for each | ||
# job-id. | ||
|
||
# ensure all ids are strings to ensure proper working w/join(). | ||
job_ids = [str(x) for x in job_ids] | ||
|
||
def query_slurm(job_ids): | ||
# internal function query_slurm encapsulates the handling of | ||
# squeue. | ||
|
@@ -257,6 +260,8 @@ def query_slurm(job_ids): | |
jobs = {} | ||
child_jobs = {} | ||
for job_id, unique_id, state in lines: | ||
# ensure unique_id is of type string for downstream use. | ||
unique_id = str(unique_id) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is this actually possible? I mean, lines is an array of strings (x.split). |
||
jobs[unique_id] = state | ||
|
||
if unique_id != job_id: | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What edge case caused problems here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I once passed in a list of job-ids that had been converted to int()s in the process of error checking and it made the entire job fail because of a downstream str.join(). IMHO this is prudent as there's nothing else checking the input parameters for this method and this kind of error is the kind that can be hard to debug for some down the road. Moreover because it uses a list comprehension it should be pretty cheap.