Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

berokka - fix broken bioperl vs perl #20286

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2020

Conversation

tseemann
Copy link
Contributor

@tseemann tseemann commented Feb 14, 2020

  • I have read the guidelines for bioconda recipes.
  • This PR adds a new recipe.
  • AFAIK, this recipe is directly relevant to the biological sciences
    (otherwise, please submit to the more general purpose conda-forge channel).
  • This PR updates an existing recipe.
  • This PR does something else (explain below).

Perl and Bioperl seem to mistmatched:

berokka -h
Can't locate Bio/SeqIO.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Bio::SeqIO module) (@INC contains: /scratch/punim0401/miniconda3/envs/berokka_env/lib/site_perl/5.26.2/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /scratch/punim0401/miniconda3/envs/berokka_env/lib/site_perl/5.26.2 /scratch/punim0401/miniconda3/envs/berokka_env/lib/5.26.2/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /scratch/punim0401/miniconda3/envs/berokka_env/lib/5.26.2 .) at /scratch/punim0401/miniconda3/envs/berokka_env/bin/berokka line 4.

@dpryan79
Copy link
Contributor

@bioconda-bot please fetch artifacts

@BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Package(s) built on CircleCI are ready for inspection:

Arch Package Repodata
noarch berokka-0.2.3-pl526_1.tar.bz2 repodata.json

You may also use conda to install these:

  • For packages on noarch:
conda install -c https://94506-42372094-gh.circle-artifacts.com/0/tmp/artifacts/packages <package name>

Docker image(s) built:

Package Tag Install with docker
berokka 0.2.3--pl526_1
showcurl "https://94506-42372094-gh.circle-artifacts.com/0/tmp/artifacts/images/berokka%3A0.2.3--pl526_1.tar.gz" | gzip -dc | docker load

@dpryan79
Copy link
Contributor

Approved so you can merge when you're happy with it.

@tseemann tseemann requested a review from dpryan79 February 16, 2020 01:24
@tseemann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dpryan79 is still says it's blocked for review

@dpryan79
Copy link
Contributor

Guess I forgot to actually hit approve, sorry about that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants