Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ENH] Add part entity for complex-valued data #424
[ENH] Add part entity for complex-valued data #424
Changes from 2 commits
d9d2324
35c0253
239c338
82f60fd
6bcc2a5
69ea608
2f67010
3c222d1
eca38ef
2f65a94
908bdba
6d376e4
3ca9763
f566cf4
d6dc2ac
8db0dea
85957a3
0a88998
08a0934
01df45c
c46715f
44a1a35
8561f4a
78aad5a
7655333
eb1f95f
e0ffe84
d800c09
9027334
a8f54a1
f04f195
72800d1
28abc54
5903d5d
cde2337
21aed29
e914b91
903324b
78e70ef
a68fc79
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure if such detailed specification and expansion of different
contrast_label
s is needed here._bold
is indeed a special case though since now it has a dedicated_phase
. So now there cannot be anotherfunc
contrast than_bold
which would have its_phase
.NB ASL BEP005 seems decided to avoid
func/
and went for a dedictedperf/
(perfusion) although its purpose AFAIK would befunc/
.Unfortunately I did not follow the discussion in #128. I would have voted for any
contrast_label
to "assume" its default "composition" - either it is a mag or phase or combined if no_part
is provided. Then #128 could have resulted in adding_part-phase
and having explicit_part-phase_bold
, opening possibilities for any other_part-phase_<contrast>
.Sure thing
_part-
makes no sense with_phase
, but I think that is just a corner case which might be gone in 2.0.So why not just to keep
[_part-<mag|phase>]_<contrast_label>
and just add a note to_phase
in the table that_part
then should not be specified. Also it might be worth starting adding "deprecation" statements on elements which will be removed in 2.0, but that would be a separate issue I guess ;)