Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FIX] Clarify continuous recording metadata fields #167
[FIX] Clarify continuous recording metadata fields #167
Changes from 1 commit
9ef1adb
f06b555
165347e
e5b6da5
0b7a530
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This sounds like it only applies to MRI data
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree- what about "Start time in seconds in relation to the first data sample in the corresponding neural dataset (negative values are allowed)"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm assuming "start of acquisition of the first volume" is an attempt to precisely define the onset of the first data sample. What about: "Start time in seconds in relation to the start of acquisition of the first data sample in the corresponding neural dataset (negative values are allowed)."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm. I'm noticing that this appears in
func/
. Is that going to cause problems with MEG/EEG/iEEG? Or would this be similar to a simultaneous fMRI/EEG?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you mean by
?
+1 on changing to: "Start time in seconds in relation to the start of acquisition of the first data sample in the corresponding neural dataset (negative values are allowed)." as @effigies suggests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sappelhoff I mean that on line 7, we specify that these files occur in the
func/
subdirectory. Should this be expanded to include other directory names?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see, yes it could be made more general, for example with a
<modality>
placeholder? The text below would have to be adjusted so that the<matches>
placeholder does not only refer to MRI data 👍There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it is probably good to add units as optional
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was moving to add this, but we should probably consider how to make this as conformant as possible with https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/02-common-principles.html#tabular-files.
For example, we could then allow the same metadata for each column (LongName, Description, Levels, Units, TermURL). So something like:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, looks like a good reuse of existing structure