Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update numpy dependency constraints and remove platform-specific… #156

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jjjermiah
Copy link
Contributor

@jjjermiah jjjermiah commented Dec 27, 2024

… entries from lock files

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the dependency specification for numpy, allowing for versions 2.0.0 and above, enhancing compatibility.
    • Added a new linting rule for migration to NumPy version 2.
    • Updated the ruff dependency version to ensure access to the latest improvements.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to multiple configuration files for the med-imagetools project. The pyproject.toml file updates the version constraint for the numpy dependency from numpy>=1.26.4,<2 to numpy>=2.0.0,<3. Additionally, the ruff.toml file adds a new linting rule "NPY201" to ensure compliance with NumPy version 2.0 migration guidelines. Lastly, the pixi.toml file updates the ruff dependency version from >=0.4.4 to >=0.4.8, maintaining the overall structure of the configuration.

Changes

File Change Summary
pyproject.toml Updated numpy dependency from numpy>=1.26.4,<2 to numpy>=2.0.0,<3
config/ruff.toml Added new linting rule "NPY201" in the select section for NumPy 2.0 migration compliance
pixi.toml Updated ruff dependency from >=0.4.4 to >=0.4.8 in [feature.quality.dependencies]

Poem

🐰 A Numpy Version Dance

Constraints fall away with glee,
No more limits, version free!
From 1.26.4 we soar,
Dependencies open a new door
Flexibility hops with delight! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3463847 and 1f2f43d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • config/ruff.toml (1 hunks)
  • pixi.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
config/ruff.toml (1)

98-101: LGTM! Good addition of NumPy 2.0 migration linting rule.

The addition of the "NPY201" rule is well-documented and appropriately categorized under a clear "MIGRATION TO NUMPY2" section. This aligns perfectly with the PR's objective of updating NumPy dependency constraints and will help catch any compatibility issues early.

pixi.toml (2)

103-103: LGTM! Ruff version update supports NumPy 2.0 migration rules.

The update to ruff >=0.4.8 is appropriate and necessary to support the newly added NPY201 rule for NumPy 2.0 migration checks.


Line range hint 8-8: Verify: Platform-specific entries removal.

The PR objectives mention removing platform-specific entries from lock files, but the platforms section still contains entries for "linux-64" and "osx-arm64". Could you clarify if these should be removed as part of this PR?


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jjjermiah jjjermiah linked an issue Dec 27, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41a7c88 and d8775c0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pixi.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)

pyproject.toml Outdated
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ requires-python = ">=3.10,<4"
dependencies = [
"h5py>=3.11.0,<4",
"joblib>=1.4.2,<2",
"numpy>=1.26.4,<2",
"numpy>=1.26.4",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider maintaining an upper bound for numpy dependency

Based on the codebase analysis, the project heavily relies on numpy's array operations, particularly for:

  1. Medical image transformations and resampling
  2. Array manipulations (transpose, reshape, where)
  3. Mathematical operations (exp, log, floor)
  4. Type handling and array creation (zeros, array, asarray)

Given that:

  • The codebase extensively uses numpy's core functionality
  • numpy 2.0 introduces breaking changes in array creation, dtypes, and type handling
  • Medical image processing requires high reliability and reproducibility
  • Other dependencies maintain upper bounds (h5py<4, pandas<3)

Recommend maintaining the upper bound:

-  "numpy>=1.26.4",
+  "numpy>=1.26.4,<2",

Key reasons:

  • Extensive use of numpy array operations in critical image processing functions
  • Medical software requires strict version control for reliability
  • Consistency with other dependency constraints in the project
  • Protection against breaking changes in numpy 2.0
🔗 Analysis chain

Consider maintaining an upper bound for numpy dependency

The removal of the upper version bound for numpy (numpy>=1.26.4) deviates from the project's consistent dependency management pattern, where other dependencies maintain upper bounds (e.g., h5py>=3.11.0,<4, pandas>=2.2.2,<3). This change could introduce risks:

  1. numpy 2.0 introduces breaking changes that might affect the medical image processing pipeline
  2. Unbounded dependencies in medical software can compromise stability and reproducibility
  3. Inconsistent version constraints make dependency resolution less predictable

Consider maintaining the upper bound:

-  "numpy>=1.26.4",
+  "numpy>=1.26.4,<2",

Let's verify the potential impact of numpy 2.0:


Let's analyze how numpy is used in the codebase to better understand the potential impact of removing the upper bound constraint.


Let's analyze the actual numpy operations used in the codebase to better understand the potential impact of numpy 2.0 changes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for numpy API usage that might be affected by 2.0 changes
rg -l 'numpy' src/ | xargs rg -A 2 'np\.(matrix|bool_|float_|int_|unicode_|string_|deprecate|dtype|typeDict)'

Length of output: 109


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for numpy usage patterns
rg -l 'numpy' src/

# Then search for specific numpy imports and usage
rg 'import numpy|from numpy' src/

# Also check for potential numpy type annotations
rg ':(?: +)?np\.' src/

Length of output: 2234


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for specific numpy API usage that might be affected by 2.0 changes
rg 'np\.' src/ -A 2 | grep -v "import"

# Also check for array operations that might be sensitive to numpy changes
rg 'np\.(array|asarray|zeros|ones|empty|full|arange|linspace|reshape|transpose|concatenate|stack|vstack|hstack|split|where|logical_|bitwise_|add|subtract|multiply|divide)' src/

Length of output: 27818

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 44.03%. Comparing base (41a7c88) to head (1f2f43d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #156   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   44.03%   44.03%           
=======================================
  Files          48       48           
  Lines        3540     3540           
=======================================
  Hits         1559     1559           
  Misses       1981     1981           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

migrate numpy to 2.0 compatability
2 participants