-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(simulated): Add Simulation Client for EVM State Transitions (4/n) #2554
Open
rezbera
wants to merge
70
commits into
add-more-simulation-tests
Choose a base branch
from
introduce-simulation-client
base: add-more-simulation-tests
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+753
−147
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t into simulated-blob-tests
rezbera
commented
Mar 4, 2025
--authrpc.addr 0.0.0.0 \ | ||
--authrpc.jwtsecret /testing/files/jwt.hex \ | ||
--authrpc.vhosts '*' \ | ||
--datadir /tmp/gethdata \ | ||
--ipcpath /tmp/gethdata/geth.ipc \ | ||
--syncmode full \ | ||
--verbosity 4 | ||
--verbosity 4 \ | ||
--nodiscover |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nodiscover as peer discovery is not required
calbera
reviewed
Mar 5, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: rename to simulation_client.go? or sim_client.go?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The primary unlock from this PR is the ability to do tests like
TestFullLifecycle_ValidBlockWithInjectedTransaction_IsSuccessful
, in which we can inject custom transactions and create valid blocks that pass processing which was previously not possibly.To do this, we must introduce the simulation client, which utilises
eth_simulateV1
to calculate the EVM state and receipts roots for a given block. These fields are necessary to correctly passNewPayload
validation.The
eth_simulateV1
API is currently missing features we require which I hope to have merged in upstream geth ethereum/go-ethereum#31304Till then, we have to use a custom image which I've built based on the linked PR. Once upstream is merged and released, we can go back to the original image.