-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
💸 cost: Adds infracost workflow, app hasn't been working well #12
Conversation
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow file, Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Manifest Files.github/workflows/infracost.yml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/infracost.yml (1 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/infracost.yml
51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/infracost.yml (3)
3-6
: Trigger configuration is appropriate.The workflow is correctly set to trigger on pull requests to the
main
branch for the eventsopened
,synchronize
, andreopened
.
8-17
: Permissions configuration is correct.The workflow has appropriate permissions to read contents and write pull requests.
11-13
: Job configuration is standard.The job is configured to run on
ubuntu-latest
, which is suitable for this workflow.
9e66862
to
681672d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/infracost.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/infracost.yml (5)
3-6
: LGTM! The trigger configuration is appropriate.The workflow is correctly set to trigger on pull request events for the main branch.
8-17
: LGTM! The permissions configuration is appropriate.The permissions are correctly set for reading contents and writing to pull requests.
11-13
: LGTM! The job configuration is appropriate.The job is correctly set to run on
ubuntu-latest
.
19-28
: Ensure proper quoting in shell commands.There is an existing shellcheck warning regarding quoting variables to prevent globbing and word splitting.
Apply the existing suggestion to fix the issue.
51-57
: Ensure proper quoting in shell commands.There is an existing shellcheck warning regarding quoting variables to prevent globbing and word splitting.
Apply the existing suggestion to fix the issue.
681672d
to
2edafea
Compare
💰 Infracost reportThis pull request is aligned with your company's FinOps policies and the Well-Architected Framework. There are also 2 pre-existing issues in the |
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/infracost.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/infracost.yml (5)
3-10
: Trigger and permissions setup looks good.The workflow is appropriately triggered on pull requests to the main branch, and the permissions are correctly set for the intended actions.
11-22
: Job setup and Infracost setup step look good.The job runs on
ubuntu-latest
, and the Infracost setup uses a specific commit hash for stability. The API key is securely accessed via secrets.
24-32
: Checkout and breakdown steps are correctly implemented.The base branch is checked out using a specific commit hash, and the cost breakdown command is correctly configured.
34-42
: Diff generation step is correctly implemented.The PR branch is checked out, and the diff command is correctly configured to compare costs with the base branch.
44-57
: Comment posting step is correctly implemented.The comment is posted using the 'update' behavior, which is the most efficient option for this use case.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores