Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: custom chains support #500

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

joepegler
Copy link
Collaborator

@joepegler joepegler commented May 20, 2024

PR-Codex overview

The focus of this PR is to add support for custom chains in the Biconomy SDK.

Detailed summary

  • Added support for custom chains in various modules
  • Updated chain configuration options in multiple files
  • Implemented custom chain creation utility functions
  • Improved file storage handling for sessions
  • Enhanced testing with custom chain scenarios

The following files were skipped due to too many changes: src/account/utils/getChain.ts

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

chore: lint

chore: return skipped tests
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 20, 2024

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
core (esm) 54.37 KB (+0.78% 🔺)
core (cjs) 59.48 KB (+0.64% 🔺)
account (tree-shaking) 52.34 KB (+0.72% 🔺)
bundler (tree-shaking) 2.63 KB (+10.15% 🔺)
paymaster (tree-shaking) 2.33 KB (0%)
modules (tree-shaking) 40.57 KB (-0.07% 🔽)

@joepegler joepegler marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2024 12:12
@joepegler joepegler requested review from VGabriel45 and livingrockrises and removed request for VGabriel45 May 23, 2024 12:41
@joepegler joepegler requested a review from VGabriel45 May 27, 2024 10:12
@joepegler joepegler merged commit b969a91 into develop May 27, 2024
6 of 8 checks passed
@joepegler joepegler deleted the feature/sma-851_custom_chains branch May 27, 2024 10:45
joepegler added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
* feat: sma-851 support custom chains
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants