Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add forceColor option to babel-code-frame #4913

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 2, 2016
Merged

Conversation

Timer
Copy link
Contributor

@Timer Timer commented Nov 30, 2016

Added a forceColor option to babel-code-frame.

Q A
Bug fix? N
Breaking change? N
New feature? Y
Deprecations? N
Spec compliancy? N/A
Tests added/pass? N/Y
Fixed tickets #4912
License MIT
Doc PR N/A
Dependency Changes N/A

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 30, 2016

Current coverage is 89.22% (diff: 100%)

No coverage report found for master at e21dcec.

Powered by Codecov. Last update e21dcec...c17db2d

@existentialism existentialism added the PR: New Feature 🚀 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories label Dec 1, 2016
@existentialism
Copy link
Member

@Timer mind adding it to the options on the README?

Otherwise, LGTM 👍

@Timer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Timer commented Dec 2, 2016

No problem @existentialism! Thanks!

@hzoo hzoo merged commit 06820ca into babel:master Dec 2, 2016
@Timer Timer deleted the force-color-frame branch December 2, 2016 04:49
panagosg7 pushed a commit to panagosg7/babel that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2017
@lock lock bot added the outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue label Oct 7, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 7, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue PR: New Feature 🚀 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants