Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🔐 Check authentication proof purpose #15

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bdeneux
Copy link
Contributor

@bdeneux bdeneux commented Aug 20, 2024

Implement authentication proof checking #11

@bdeneux bdeneux linked an issue Aug 20, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the authentication logic within the credential management system. Key updates include restructuring constant declarations, expanding proof validation in the parsing function, and introducing new error handling mechanisms. Test coverage has been improved with additional scenarios, ensuring more precise error reporting and broader validation. Overall, these modifications improve code modularity, readability, and robustness in handling verifiable credentials.

Changes

Files Change Summary
credential/auth.go, credential/errors.go, credential/parser.go Restructured constants, expanded proof extraction and validation, added new error constant ErrInvalidProof, improved error handling in withCheck.
credential/auth_test.go Updated expected values in tests, modified error handling for invalid proofs, added new test cases for broader validation scenarios.
credential/testdata/*.jsonld Updated JSON-LD structures to reflect new issuer IDs, adjusted proof details including timestamps and purposes, added new credential scenarios.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@bdeneux bdeneux force-pushed the feat/auth-check-proof branch from acd3711 to 28a2844 Compare August 20, 2024 09:49
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files Patch % Lines
credential/auth.go 71.42% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
credential/parser.go 77.77% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Files Coverage Δ
credential/errors.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
credential/auth.go 93.93% <71.42%> (-6.07%) ⬇️
credential/parser.go 74.60% <77.77%> (-0.40%) ⬇️

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
credential/testdata/invalid_not-authentication-proof.jsonld (1)

1-23: Mismatch in Proof Purpose for Authentication

The JSON-LD document uses "assertionMethod" as the proof purpose, which is not suitable for authentication purposes. The test case in credential/auth_test.go confirms that this setup is expected to cause an error. Consider using "authentication" as the proof purpose to align with the intended use case.

  • File: credential/testdata/invalid_not-authentication-proof.jsonld
  • Suggested Change: "proofPurpose": "authentication"
Analysis chain

Verify the new JSON-LD document structure and purpose.

This new document uses a proof purpose of "assertionMethod." Ensure that its structure and purpose align with the intended use case and do not conflict with the authentication logic.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the structure and purpose of the new JSON-LD document.

# Test: Validate the JSON-LD structure and ensure the proof purpose aligns with the intended use case.
# Expect: The document should be valid and correctly structured for its intended purpose.
jq '.' credential/testdata/invalid_not-authentication-proof.jsonld

Length of output: 1149


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation or comments related to the use of "assertionMethod" in JSON-LD documents.
rg "assertionMethod" --context 5

Length of output: 16675

Tools
Gitleaks

7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 018b077 and 28a2844.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • credential/auth.go (2 hunks)
  • credential/auth_test.go (3 hunks)
  • credential/errors.go (1 hunks)
  • credential/parser.go (3 hunks)
  • credential/testdata/invalid_issuer-differs-subject.jsonld (1 hunks)
  • credential/testdata/invalid_not-authentication-proof.jsonld (1 hunks)
  • credential/testdata/valid.jsonld (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Gitleaks
credential/testdata/invalid_issuer-differs-subject.jsonld

7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

credential/testdata/valid.jsonld

7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

credential/testdata/invalid_not-authentication-proof.jsonld

7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

credential/auth_test.go

39-39: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


40-40: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


70-70: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


70-70: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

GitHub Check: codecov/patch
credential/auth.go

[warning] 71-71: credential/auth.go#L71
Added line #L71 was not covered by tests

credential/parser.go

[warning] 145-145: credential/parser.go#L145
Added line #L145 was not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (13)
credential/errors.go (1)

11-11: Addition of ErrInvalidProof is appropriate.

The new error constant ErrInvalidProof enhances the error handling capabilities by specifically addressing invalid credential proofs. This addition is consistent with the existing error handling structure.

credential/testdata/invalid_issuer-differs-subject.jsonld (2)

7-11: Potential exposure of sensitive information.

The static analysis tool detected potential exposure of sensitive information in the credentialSubject.id, toService, and issuer fields. Ensure that these values do not expose sensitive or private information.

Verification successful

Identifiers in Test Data Are Not Sensitive

The did:key identifiers found in credential/testdata/invalid_issuer-differs-subject.jsonld are likely used for testing purposes and do not represent real sensitive information. These identifiers are commonly used in decentralized identity systems and are not inherently sensitive by themselves. Ensure that similar identifiers in production environments are handled appropriately to avoid exposure.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential exposure of sensitive information in JSON-LD document.

# Test: Search for sensitive identifiers in the document.
# Expect: Ensure identifiers do not expose sensitive data.
rg 'did:key' credential/testdata/invalid_issuer-differs-subject.jsonld

Length of output: 427

Tools
Gitleaks

7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


2-22: Verify the updates to the JSON-LD document.

The updates to the issuer, proof, and verificationMethod fields reflect a change in the credential's purpose and validation. Ensure that these changes are consistent with the intended authentication logic and do not introduce validation issues.

Tools
Gitleaks

7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

credential/testdata/valid.jsonld (2)

7-11: Potential exposure of sensitive information.

The static analysis tool detected potential exposure of sensitive information in the credentialSubject.id, toService, and issuer fields. Ensure that these values do not expose sensitive or private information.

Tools
Gitleaks

7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


2-22: Verify the updates to the JSON-LD document.

The updates to the credentialSubject.id, issuer, and proof fields reflect a change in the credential's purpose and validation. Ensure that these changes are consistent with the intended authentication logic and do not introduce validation issues.

Verification successful

Updates to JSON-LD Document Verified

The updates to the credentialSubject.id, issuer, and proof fields in the JSON-LD document are consistent with the authentication logic implemented in the codebase. The logic ensures that the proofPurpose is authentication and that the issuer matches the credentialSubject.id, aligning with the intended validation.

  • Validation logic is present in credential/parser.go and credential/auth.go.
  • Test cases in auth_test.go confirm these checks.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of JSON-LD document updates.

# Test: Validate the JSON-LD structure and ensure the changes align with the authentication logic.
# Expect: The document should be valid and consistent with the updated authentication purpose.
jq '.' credential/testdata/valid.jsonld

Length of output: 1121


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for validation logic related to credentialSubject.id, issuer, and proof in the codebase.
rg 'credentialSubject\.id|issuer|proof' --context 5

Length of output: 39981

Tools
Gitleaks

7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

credential/testdata/invalid_not-authentication-proof.jsonld (1)

7-11: Potential exposure of sensitive information.

The static analysis tool detected potential exposure of sensitive information in the credentialSubject.id, toService, and issuer fields. Ensure that these values do not expose sensitive or private information.

Tools
Gitleaks

7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

credential/auth.go (1)

10-13: Constants restructuring improves readability.

The grouping of ClaimToService and ProofPurposeAuthentication into a single constant block enhances the organization of constants related to authentication.

credential/parser.go (1)

79-80: Modular proof extraction improves clarity.

The use of extractProof in withCheck enhances modularity and provides more specific error handling.

credential/auth_test.go (5)

39-39: Update in test setup for valid credential.

The ID field update in the AuthClaim struct reflects changes in the expected input or corrects the test setup.

Tools
Gitleaks

39-39: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


46-46: Improved error handling for unsigned credentials.

The update to the expected error reflects more nuanced handling of invalid proofs, indicating improved error handling logic.


70-70: Consistency in issuer and subject relationships.

The update to the issuer's ID ensures consistency in the test's assertions regarding issuer and subject relationships.

Tools
Gitleaks

70-70: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


70-70: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


97-102: Enhanced test coverage for future-issued credentials.

The new test case for credentials issued in the future enhances test coverage by addressing specific scenarios related to credential validation.


103-108: Ensuring correct proof purpose validation.

The new test case for validating the proof purpose against the expected authentication target enhances test coverage.

credential/auth.go Show resolved Hide resolved
credential/parser.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@bdeneux bdeneux self-assigned this Aug 20, 2024
@bdeneux bdeneux requested review from ccamel and amimart August 20, 2024 12:33
Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great :)

Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm 👍

@bdeneux bdeneux merged commit 94fa408 into main Aug 20, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@bdeneux bdeneux deleted the feat/auth-check-proof branch August 20, 2024 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

🔐 Check authentication proofPurpose on VC
3 participants