Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

👤 Implements auth handler #12

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

👤 Implements auth handler #12

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

bdeneux
Copy link
Contributor

@bdeneux bdeneux commented Aug 19, 2024

Since authentication has been implemented on #10, this PR add tests for the auth handler mapped to the implemented authentication proxy. It add also some error handling to return to the http server.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the JWT authentication functionality significantly enhance error handling and testing within the Axone SDK. Detailed error responses in the HTTP authentication handler and middleware provide clearer feedback to clients. Additionally, the introduction of a comprehensive suite of unit tests ensures that both components function correctly across various scenarios. Collectively, these changes improve the robustness and user-friendliness of the API.

Changes

Files Change Summary
auth/jwt/http.go Enhanced error handling in HTTPAuthHandler and VerifyHTTPMiddleware with detailed error messages and structured responses.
auth/jwt/http_test.go Added a suite of unit tests for the JWT authentication handler and middleware, covering valid and invalid scenarios to ensure correctness.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant AuthHandler
    participant Middleware
    participant AuthService

    Client->>AuthHandler: Send request
    AuthHandler->>AuthService: Authenticate credentials
    AuthService-->>AuthHandler: Return success or failure
    AuthHandler-->>Client: Return HTTP response

    Client->>Middleware: Send request with JWT
    Middleware->>AuthService: Verify JWT
    AuthService-->>Middleware: Return validity
    Middleware-->>Client: Return HTTP response
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 30.76923% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files Patch % Lines
auth/jwt/http.go 30.76% 6 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Files Coverage Δ
auth/jwt/http.go 70.00% <30.76%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@bdeneux bdeneux force-pushed the feat/auth-http-handler branch 2 times, most recently from 79f11f8 to 1b59af6 Compare August 19, 2024 14:23
@bdeneux bdeneux force-pushed the feat/auth-http-handler branch from 1b59af6 to 8d4df8f Compare August 19, 2024 14:26
@bdeneux bdeneux marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2024 15:16
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cff9509 and 8d4df8f.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • auth/jwt/http.go (3 hunks)
  • auth/jwt/http_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
auth/jwt/http.go

[warning] 17-18: auth/jwt/http.go#L17-L18
Added lines #L17 - L18 were not covered by tests


[warning] 29-30: auth/jwt/http.go#L29-L30
Added lines #L29 - L30 were not covered by tests


[warning] 35-36: auth/jwt/http.go#L35-L36
Added lines #L35 - L36 were not covered by tests

Gitleaks
auth/jwt/http_test.go

31-31: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


86-86: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


104-104: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

Additional comments not posted (10)
auth/jwt/http.go (6)

16-18: Error handling improvements are approved.

The addition of detailed error messages for request body reading failures enhances the robustness of the API.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 17-18: auth/jwt/http.go#L17-L18
Added lines #L17 - L18 were not covered by tests


22-24: Error handling improvements are approved.

The addition of detailed error messages for authentication failures provides better feedback to clients.


28-30: Error handling improvements are approved.

The addition of detailed error messages for JWT issuance failures is beneficial for debugging.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 29-30: auth/jwt/http.go#L29-L30
Added lines #L29 - L30 were not covered by tests


34-36: Error handling improvements are approved.

The addition of detailed error messages for response writing failures ensures clients receive meaningful feedback.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 35-36: auth/jwt/http.go#L35-L36
Added lines #L35 - L36 were not covered by tests


45-46: Error handling improvements are approved.

The use of http.Error for unauthorized access errors provides clear feedback to clients.


Line range hint 53-56: Implementation is correct.

The function correctly checks for a Bearer token and returns an error if it is not found.

auth/jwt/http_test.go (4)

19-44: Test structure is approved.

The test cases for valid and invalid authentication scenarios are well-structured and comprehensive.

Tools
Gitleaks

31-31: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


83-120: Test structure is approved.

The test cases for valid, invalid, and missing token scenarios are comprehensive and well-structured.

Tools
Gitleaks

86-86: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


104-104: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


31-31: Potential exposure of sensitive information.

The DID used in the test data may resemble a real identifier. Ensure that it is a mock value and not sensitive.

- DID:               "did:key:zQ3shpoUHzwcgdt2gxjqHHnJnNkBVd4uX3ZBhmPiM7J93yqCr",
+ DID:               "did:key:zMockDIDForTestingPurposes",
Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: bdeneux
PR: axone-protocol/axone-sdk#10
File: auth/proxy_test.go:26-26
Timestamp: 2024-08-13T13:22:54.034Z
Learning: The DID keys used in the test files of the axone-sdk repository are specifically generated for testing purposes and are not sensitive.
Tools
Gitleaks

31-31: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


86-86: Potential exposure of sensitive information.

The DID used in the test data may resemble a real identifier. Ensure that it is a mock value and not sensitive.

- DID:               "did:key:zQ3shpoUHzwcgdt2gxjqHHnJnNkBVd4uX3ZBhmPiM7J93yqCr",
+ DID:               "did:key:zMockDIDForTestingPurposes",
Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: bdeneux
PR: axone-protocol/axone-sdk#10
File: auth/proxy_test.go:26-26
Timestamp: 2024-08-13T13:22:54.034Z
Learning: The DID keys used in the test files of the axone-sdk repository are specifically generated for testing purposes and are not sensitive.
Tools
Gitleaks

86-86: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

auth/jwt/http_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@bdeneux bdeneux requested review from ccamel and amimart August 20, 2024 07:35
@bdeneux bdeneux self-assigned this Aug 20, 2024
@bdeneux bdeneux linked an issue Aug 20, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's great thanks, just a minor remark :)

auth/jwt/http.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Arnaud Mimart <33665250+amimart@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d4df8f and 4102bc2.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • auth/jwt/http.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • auth/jwt/http.go

Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@bdeneux bdeneux merged commit 8661fa9 into main Aug 21, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@bdeneux bdeneux deleted the feat/auth-http-handler branch August 21, 2024 05:38
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

VC Authentication
3 participants