Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Update README.md #5975

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

chore: Update README.md #5975

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

bkaws
Copy link
Contributor

@bkaws bkaws commented Nov 4, 2024

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the Apache 2.0 License.

@bkaws bkaws requested a review from a team as a code owner November 4, 2024 18:54
@bkaws bkaws requested review from KollaAdithya and removed request for a team November 4, 2024 18:54
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

🍕 Here are the new binary sizes!

Name New size (kiB) size (kiB) Delta (%)
macOS (amd) 58548 58112 +0.75
macOS (arm) 59628 59156 +0.80
linux (amd) 51336 50956 +0.75
linux (arm) 50624 50244 +0.76
windows (amd) 48336 47988 +0.73

@bkaws bkaws merged commit 949daed into mainline Nov 4, 2024
10 checks passed
@bkaws bkaws deleted the bkaws-patch-1 branch November 4, 2024 19:06
@SoundsSerious
Copy link

@build-with-aws-copilot would be nice to know if aws is or is not going to retire this codebase

@jeffc-dev
Copy link

@bkaws Can you provide an update as to the status of this project?

Should people be migrating off of Copilot?

@build-with-aws-copilot
Copy link
Contributor

@build-with-aws-copilot would be nice to know if aws is or is not going to retire this codebase

It does look like AWS has stopped adding new features to Copilot. Discussion

(I published a few guides on how to use AWS Copilot based on my passion. But I'm not affiliated with AWS in any way.)
https://build-with-aws-copilot.github.io/rails_docs/
https://leanpub.com/building-a-full-web-stack-with-docker-and-aws-copilot

@wub
Copy link

wub commented Dec 2, 2024

Hey @bkaws and @Madrigal, can anyone from AWS please comment on the future of Copilot? We run our entire SaaS on Copilot, and it would be great to know if we should invest our efforts elsewhere. Thank you.

@jeffc-dev
Copy link

Hoping to hear something from @bkaws or @Madrigal about this...

At this point, though, I think I'm probably going to go with a non-AWS solution for my needs.

@afgallo
Copy link

afgallo commented Jan 13, 2025

Has anyone found a suitable replacement to Copilot?

@SoundsSerious
Copy link

SoundsSerious commented Jan 13, 2025

@afgallo I am actively working to replace it using terraform. Its way harder timewise but its somewhat of a standard.

A solution for creating terraform from copilot:

  1. for each an environment and each service use the cli: package commands to create cloud formation.
  2. using a utility like cf2tf you can convert like 80-90% of the app to terraform and then there's some clean up to do.

You can also package pipelines to keep everything the same for each environment, as well but I am just creating the one terraform environment an using variables to segment environments and other features / config

Instead we are using github actions to build images and deploy the terraform

@afgallo
Copy link

afgallo commented Jan 13, 2025

@SoundsSerious terraform is a solid choice. I've been considering something different, leveraging our existing CloudFormation templates and migrate infra related components (i.e mostly copilot environment stuff) to Spectre and use good old EC2 instances with Kamal.

@ejunker
Copy link

ejunker commented Jan 21, 2025

I have not used it but another alternative to look into would be sst which supports ECS Fargate using their cluster component https://sst.dev/docs/component/aws/cluster

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants