fix(stepfunctions): various JSONata query language fix

[GavinZZ]

Issue # (if applicable)

Closes #33403 and #33374 and #33396.

Reason for this change

There are three issues here:

1. For summary, the first issue is basically that assign property cannot be accessed with using Map.jsonata(...) but available if we directly create map through new Map(...) using JSONATA query language.
2. For summary, the second issue is that JSONATA main PR added the outputs and assign property in the CatchProps interface for AddCatch functionality. But I don't think it's being used in the actual addCatch call https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/packages/aws-cdk-lib/aws-stepfunctions/lib/states/state.ts#L398.
3. Result writer and item reader class do not support using JSONATA. Deployment will fails due to if SFN is set to use JSONATA, it expects Arguments in the ASL instead of Parameters.

Description of changes

Fix both issues by fixing the interface inheritance and added the props to AddCatch method.
Support JSONATA as the query language.

Description of how you validated changes

Added integ test and unit test to make sure that

Checklist

• My code adheres to the CONTRIBUTING GUIDE and DESIGN GUIDELINES

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.16%. Comparing base (f4453c7) to head (c78af25).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #33404   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.16%   82.16%           
=======================================
  Files         119      119           
  Lines        6857     6857           
  Branches     1157     1157           
=======================================
  Hits         5634     5634           
  Misses       1120     1120           
  Partials      103      103           

Flag	Coverage Δ
suite.unit	82.16% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk	∅ <ø> (∅)
packages/aws-cdk-lib/core	82.16% <ø> (ø)

[GavinZZ]

Marking this PR as pr/do-not-merge. Pending a review from @WinterYukky prior to merge this change.

Also update the PR label to correctly reflect the issue priority.

[aws-cdk-automation]

(This review is outdated)

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

[WinterYukky]

Hi, thank you so much for fixing this bug. I'm very honored that you started working on this fix right away.

assign and _addCatch fix seems good! On the other hand, itemReader and itemWriter may need to be changes. In itemReader and itemWriter, whether to use Arguments or Parameters is determined only by the top-level or Map state queryLanguage. In this PR, users can use s3objectsitemReader.jsonata() and s3objectsitemReader.jsonPath(), but for example, s3objectsitemReader.jsonPath() (i.e. Parameters) can be used when the Map state uses JSONata we can't.

// invalid cofigure
 const distributedMap = sfn.DistributedMap.jsonPath(this, 'DistributedMap', {
    itemReader: sfn.S3ObjectsItemReader.jsonata({
      bucketNamePath: '{% $bucketName %}',
      prefix: '{% $prefix %}',
    }),
 });

This should probably be processed projectively with CDK without relying on user specifications. Also, since the properties used in JSONata and JSONPath are not different, there is probably no need to use different constructors.

 const distributedMap = sfn.DistributedMap.jsonPath(this, 'DistributedMap', {
    itemReader: new sfn.S3ObjectsItemReader({
      bucketName: '{% $bucketName %}',
      prefix: '{% $prefix %}',
    }),
 });

[GavinZZ]

@WinterYukky I addressed all your comments. Please give it another review once you're available.

[aaythapa]

@mergify update

[mergify]

update

✅ Branch has been successfully updated

Dismiss to get this merged and released.

[GavinZZ]

@Mergifyio requeue

[mergify]

requeue

❌ This pull request head commit has not been previously disembarked from queue.

[GavinZZ]

@mergify update

[mergify]

update

✅ Branch has been successfully updated

[aws-cdk-automation]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
• Commit ID: c78af25
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[github-actions]

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.