Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(apigatewayv2): throw ValidationError instead of untyped errors #33082

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

HBobertz
Copy link
Contributor

@HBobertz HBobertz commented Jan 23, 2025

Issue

aws-apigatewayv2-integrations for #32569

Description of changes

ValidationErrors everywhere

Describe any new or updated permissions being added

n/a

Description of how you validated changes

Existing tests. Exemptions granted as this is basically a refactor of existing code.

Checklist


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Jan 23, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team January 23, 2025 00:21
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Jan 23, 2025
aws-cdk-automation

This comment was marked as outdated.

@HBobertz HBobertz changed the title feat(apigatewayv2-integrations): throw ValidationError instead of untyped errors feat(apigatewayv2): throw ValidationError instead of untyped errors Jan 23, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.57%. Comparing base (5e0f16d) to head (0327119).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #33082   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.57%   81.57%           
=======================================
  Files         227      227           
  Lines       13793    13793           
  Branches     2419     2419           
=======================================
  Hits        11251    11251           
  Misses       2270     2270           
  Partials      272      272           
Flag Coverage Δ
suite.unit 81.57% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk 80.99% <ø> (ø)
packages/aws-cdk-lib/core 82.17% <ø> (ø)

@mrgrain mrgrain added pr-linter/exempt-readme The PR linter will not require README changes pr-linter/exempt-test The PR linter will not require test changes pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes labels Jan 23, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review January 23, 2025 01:00

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@HBobertz HBobertz marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2025 01:44
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(This review is outdated)

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review January 24, 2025 12:25

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(This review is outdated)

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 24, 2025

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: pull request dequeued.

Pull request #33082 has been dequeued. The pull request rule doesn't match anymore. The following conditions don't match anymore:

  • #changes-requested-reviews-by=0
  • status-success~=AWS CodeBuild us-east-1
  • any of: [🔀 queue conditions]
    • all of: [📌 queue conditions of queue default-squash]
      • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-neutral = codecov/patch/packages/aws-cdk
        • check-skipped = codecov/patch/packages/aws-cdk
        • check-success = codecov/patch/packages/aws-cdk
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-neutral = codecov/patch/packages/aws-cdk-lib/core
        • check-skipped = codecov/patch/packages/aws-cdk-lib/core
        • check-success = codecov/patch/packages/aws-cdk-lib/core
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-neutral = codecov/project/packages/aws-cdk
        • check-skipped = codecov/project/packages/aws-cdk
        • check-success = codecov/project/packages/aws-cdk
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-neutral = codecov/project/packages/aws-cdk-lib/core
        • check-skipped = codecov/project/packages/aws-cdk-lib/core
        • check-success = codecov/project/packages/aws-cdk-lib/core
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-neutral = AWS CodeBuild us-east-1 (AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv)
        • check-skipped = AWS CodeBuild us-east-1 (AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv)
        • check-success = AWS CodeBuild us-east-1 (AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv)

You should look at the reason for the failure and decide if the pull request needs to be fixed or if you want to requeue it.

If you want to requeue this pull request, you need to post a comment with the text: @mergifyio requeue

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review January 24, 2025 12:55

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

@mrgrain
Copy link
Contributor

mrgrain commented Jan 24, 2025

@Mergifyio requeue

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 24, 2025

requeue

✅ The queue state of this pull request has been cleaned. It can be re-embarked automatically

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 0327119
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 5377586 into main Jan 24, 2025
23 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the bobertzh/apigwv2-integrations-validations branch January 24, 2025 13:10
Copy link

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p2 pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes pr-linter/exempt-readme The PR linter will not require README changes pr-linter/exempt-test The PR linter will not require test changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants