Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(sqs): do not emit grants to the AWS-managed encryption key #3169

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 5, 2019

Conversation

RomainMuller
Copy link
Contributor

Grants on the alias/aws/sqs KMS key alias are not necessary since the
key will implicitly allow for it's intended usage to be fulfilled (as
opposed to how you have to manage grants yourself when using a
user-managed key instead).

This removes the statement that was generated using an invalid resource
entry.

Fixes #2794


Please read the contribution guidelines and follow the pull-request checklist.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

Grants on the `alias/aws/sqs` KMS key alias are not necessary since the
key will implicitly allow for it's intended usage to be fulfilled (as
opposed to how you have to manage grants yourself when using a
user-managed key instead).

This removes the statement that was generated using an invalid resource
entry.

Fixes #2794
@RomainMuller RomainMuller requested a review from a team as a code owner July 2, 2019 11:52
@ghost ghost requested a review from skinny85 July 2, 2019 11:53
@RomainMuller RomainMuller changed the title fix(sqs): Do not emit grants to the AWS-managed encryption key fix(sqs): do not emit grants to the AWS-managed encryption key Jul 2, 2019
@stephankaag
Copy link
Contributor

Works for me 👍

@RomainMuller RomainMuller merged commit 07f017b into master Aug 5, 2019
@RomainMuller RomainMuller deleted the rmuller/issue2794 branch August 5, 2019 17:00
eladb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2019
Grants on the `alias/aws/sqs` KMS key alias are not necessary since the
key will implicitly allow for it's intended usage to be fulfilled (as
opposed to how you have to manage grants yourself when using a
user-managed key instead).

This removes the statement that was generated using an invalid resource
entry.

Fixes #2794
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2019
* chore: update package-lock.json

* feat(eks): define kubernetes resources

This change allows defining arbitrary Kubernetes resources within an EKS cluster.

* nice!

* update readme

* Update README.md

* feat(events): ability to add cross-account targets (#3323)

This adds the capability of adding a target to an event rule
that belongs to a different account than the rule itself.
Required for things like cross-account CodePipelines with source actions triggered by events.

* chore(ci): add mergify config file (#3502)

* chore: update jsii to 0.14.3 (#3513)

* fix(iam): correctly limit the default PolicyName to 128 characters (#3487)

Our logic for trimming the length of the default IAM policy name was not working,
as it wasn't updated when logicalId became a Token rather than a literate string,
and so it was never actually triggered
(it just checked that the display name of the Token was less than 128 characters,
which it always is).
The fix is to resolve the logical ID Token before applying the trimming logic.

Fixes #3402

* v1.3.0 (#3516)

See CHANGELOG

* fix: typo in restapi.ts (#3530)

* feat(ecs): container dependencies (#3032)

Add new addContainerDependencies method to allow for container dependencies
Fixes #2490

* feat(s3-deployment): CloudFront invalidation (#3213)

see #3106

* docs(core): findChild gets direct child only (#3512)

* doc(iam): update references to addManagedPolicy (#3511)

* fix(sqs): do not emit grants to the AWS-managed encryption key (#3169)

Grants on the `alias/aws/sqs` KMS key alias are not necessary since the
key will implicitly allow for it's intended usage to be fulfilled (as
opposed to how you have to manage grants yourself when using a
user-managed key instead).

This removes the statement that was generated using an invalid resource
entry.

Fixes #2794

* fix(lambda): allow ArnPrincipal in grantInvoke (#3501)

Fixes #3264 

I'm trying to allow a lambda function in another account to be able to invoke my CDK generated lambda function. This works through the CLI like so:

    aws lambda add-permission --function-name=myFunction --statement-id=ABoldStatement --action=lambda:InvokeFunction --principal=arn:aws:iam::{account_id}:role/a_lambda_execution_role

But CDK doesn't seem to allow me to add an ArnPrincipal doing something like this:

    myFunction.grantInvoke(new iam.ArnPrincipal(props.myARN))

With the error:

    Invalid principal type for Lambda permission statement: ArnPrincipal. Supported: AccountPrincipal, ServicePrincipal

This PR allows ArnPrincipal to be passed to lambda.grantInvoke.

There might be some additional validation required on the exact ARN as I believe only some ARNs are supported by lambda add-permission

* chore(contrib): remove API stabilization disclaimer

* fix(ssm): add GetParameters action to grantRead() (#3546)

* misc

* rename `KubernetesManifest` to `KubernetesResource` and `addResource`
* move AWS Auth APIs to `cluster.awsAuth` and expose `AwsAuth`
* remove the yaml library (we can just use a JSON stream)
* add support for adding accounts to aws-auth
* fix cluster deletion bug
* move kubctl app info to constants

* addManifest => addResource

* update test expectations

* add unit test for customresrouce.ref

* fix sample link
@NGL321 NGL321 added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Sep 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

KMS-Managed SQS encyption generating invalid IAM policy for Lambda func
4 participants