-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
APIGW - Method.methodArn not replacing path parameters with asterisks #8036
Labels
Comments
@willdady - can you also include code on how you constructed this EDIT: Sorry, not the |
nija-at
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 26, 2020
Path parameters in API Gateway allows for paths to contain the resource id, such as `/pets/{petId}/comments/{commentId}`. When generating the ARN for a Method to this Resource, the path parameters should be placed with asterisks, such as `/pets/*/comments/*`. fixes #8036
nija-at
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 26, 2020
Path parameters in API Gateway allows for paths to contain the resource id, such as `/pets/{petId}/comments/{commentId}`. When generating the ARN for a Method to this Resource, the path parameters should be placed with asterisks, such as `/pets/*/comments/*`. fixes #8036
Update - I was able to reproduce this error and the fix is here - #8206 |
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2020
…ks (#8206) Path parameters in API Gateway allows for paths to contain the resource id, such as `/pets/{petId}/comments/{commentId}`. When generating the ARN for a Method to this Resource, the path parameters should be placed with asterisks, such as `/pets/*/comments/*`. fixes #8036 ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
API Gateway
Method.methodArn
incorrectly returns the ARN with named path parameters where they should have been replaced with asterisk.For example, currently returning this:
Should be this:
Reproduction Steps
Environment
This is 🐛 Bug Report
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: