Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe even here we can update - https://github.com/aws/amazon-vpc-cni-k8s/blob/master/go.mod#L8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a good idea. This is going to bring few changes.
And
the resolution seems like places we are using
types/current
(around 5 files) It should be updated.Ref https://www.cni.dev/docs/spec-upgrades/#libcni-changes-in-cni-v10
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This commit in CNI introduces a breaking change for us as it removes
Version
field.By removing current type in CNI, the CNI has broken the backwards compatibility too.
I am evaluating if it is a good idea to upgrade it by making necessary changes. The other option is only upgrade the binary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah maybe binary makes sense for now considering the criticality? @achevuru or @M00nF1sh any thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tried to upgrade the library. We shall bring it separately. as removing of
Version
field failsmake
binaries.We also have find a reliable way to different v4 and v6 addresses without that field.