DXCDT-583: Convert scopes into a drop down in interactive mode in test token cmd

[sergiught]

🔧 Changes

This PR converts the scopes flag into a multi selector picker when in interactive mode for the auth0 test token command.

📚 References

🔬 Testing

📝 Checklist

• All new/changed/fixed functionality is covered by tests (or N/A)
• I have added documentation for all new/changed functionality (or N/A)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 73 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (88bd00a) 72.90% compared to head (a4b2a20) 72.48%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #907      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.90%   72.48%   -0.42%     
==========================================
  Files          93       93              
  Lines       12337    12412      +75     
==========================================
+ Hits         8994     8997       +3     
- Misses       2822     2893      +71     
- Partials      521      522       +1     

Files	Coverage Δ
internal/cli/test.go	36.92% <8.75%> (-9.88%)	⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Widcket]

Should we print a warning when the app is M2M and scopes were passed?

[willvedd]

Should we print a warning when the app is M2M and scopes were passed?

Maybe? It may be worth educating users of that misuse but there will be no ill consequences if they do include them.

[Widcket]

Should it be an "info" instead of a "warning" then?

[Widcket]

As a user, if a pass a combination of inputs expecting a certain result, I expect the app to let me know if this result cannot be achieved.

[Widcket]

It is a form of invalid input, after all. I wonder if there should be a flag validation rule for this, instead of a printed 'info'.

[willvedd]

Pulled and confirm that this works as intended.