No implicit IN condition operator for array value #1092
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mvorisek
force-pushed
the
no_implicit_array_in_condition
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f292d95 to
ef1fdd2
Compare
mvorisek
force-pushed
the
no_implicit_array_in_condition
branch
from
ef1fdd2 to
eb9f33f
Compare
mvorisek
force-pushed
the
no_implicit_array_in_condition
branch
from
eb9f33f to
32d1ae9
Compare
mvorisek
force-pushed
the
no_implicit_array_in_condition
branch
from
32d1ae9 to
8a9e01a
Compare
mvorisek
force-pushed
the
no_implicit_array_in_condition
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f1ca317 to
e854ec9
Compare
mvorisek
force-pushed
the
no_implicit_array_in_condition
branch
from
e854ec9 to
fe23290
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Value can be
arraywhich is not rare forjsonDBAL type, thus we cannot check if array on managed type.WIP as the BC break must be minimal.
We can probably keep the check array/SQL persistences, as unmanaged type can never be an array.